Let me simplify the 2006 elections

[TheFarseer]

on one side you have a party that believes in researching alternative energy so that we can keep more of our money instead of sending it to Arab countries that don't like us and so we can have a cleaner environment. This same side believes in research that has the potential to cure diseases that afflict millions of Americans. What's more, they believe in making care affordable for all Americans so no one has to suffer all alone with no one to help them. They also believe in high paying jobs for Americans so they can buy goods and services that will create jobs and lift the economy out of stagnation. They believe in a balanced budget so we don't have to send hundreds of billions of dollars to China and Saudi Arabia every year in the form of interest with nothing to show in return except more red ink.

On the other side you have a group of people who REALLY REALLY REALLY want to start World War III. Is this really a difficult decision????

[ladjf]

1. And the other side may depend on election fraud to prevail.

[yourout]

3. not may...........will.

Way to much at stake for the pukes to allow an honest election.

[ladjf]

5. I knew that it was "will". I was just trying to be somewhat diplomatic.

[saltpoint]

2. 'Long as they ain't no lesbyuns gittin' married. That's the bottom line

fur me. Yessir. Praise Jesus, bomb the terruhists, and God Bless George W. Bush!'

[MissWaverly]

4. could you add the other party sees nukes as a tool

for diplomacy and is looking forward to using it.