Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

President Bush: Protecting the Sanctity of Goo in a Dish

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 08:00 PM
Original message
President Bush: Protecting the Sanctity of Goo in a Dish
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. while insuring America fall behind in medical breakthroughs.
Thanks Chimpy McFlightsuit.:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Every sperm is sacred, every sperm is great,...
And when a sperm is wasted, God gets quite irate!" </python>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. LOL! well it isn't all goo in a dish
I actually have 9 and 11 year old children from goo in the dish. The fact is though the doctors threw a lot of eggs and embryos away before I got my good goo! And I would not change a thing. By far most embryos are not viable. That escapes the thinking skills of troglodytes like bush.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. He and his "followers" can believe whatever they want is in the dish,
the BIG hypocracy I see here is that the "whatever it is" is being destroyed!!!!!

I wrote to both of my Pub Senators (who both voted against this bill) and asked them to explain to me how they can possible believe it's better to destroy these embryos than to use them for a potential breakthrough in cures for the worst illnesses of the World?

I'm sure I'll get a response becaue I always do, but it's also always a side step from the original question!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. No Blastocyst Left Behind!
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC