DanCa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-21-06 12:29 AM
Original message |
How old are the Snowflake kids and why are they appearing now? |
|
Why haven't we heard of them before? My spider sense is tingling.
|
az chela
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-21-06 12:34 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Well you gotta have those photo ops,it's all bush knows how to do |
|
He probably had karl hire some kids so he could impress his base as he signs death warrants for millions of people who need stem cell research.It is too complicated for him to understand and since he is living in the 1800's he hasnt a clue.He does not care about anyones life.Just look at the massacres in the middle east and he loves it
|
DanCa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-21-06 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Will bush loves killing things with eyes |
|
That's why his base doesn't want to kill embryos. It isn't any fun to kill something that you can't see sufering in it's eyes. Oh btw did i forget to mention that the cell doesn't have a nervous system yet?
|
uppityperson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-21-06 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
daleo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-21-06 12:38 AM
Response to Original message |
3. How about global warming? |
|
What will happen to the snowflake kids???
|
DanCa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-21-06 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Just like what will happen if you throw water on Ann Coulter.
|
Gold Metal Flake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-21-06 12:51 AM
Response to Original message |
5. They are appearing now because in six weeks they form a chrysalys... |
|
...and pupate into Republican lobbyists. So now is the last time you can see them when they are cute and not sucking the blood of brown skin people.
|
no_hypocrisy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-21-06 06:05 AM
Response to Original message |
7. I think * needs to promote the "Snowflake Babies" for the larger goal |
|
of outlawing abortion. If he universally protects a zygote in a freezer because it is a "life" in his opinion (not fact, opinion), then he must therefore protect a zygote in a womb from being extracted. There goes first trimester abortion rights. Oh, it won't necessarily be that direct. He'll probably introduce a bill to keep the zygotes indefinitely frozen and will make it illegal to "dispose" of them because the latter would be "extermination" and/or "murder". Then he'll move on to the two-cell solution in wombs within the human incubators (i.e., women).
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:26 PM
Response to Original message |