Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did anyone see the pic of the snowflake baby flipping off Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 07:56 AM
Original message
Did anyone see the pic of the snowflake baby flipping off Bush


And why are all these kids WHITE!! I mean this is so telling me something that ever picture I find of a snowflake baby - they're white
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GrpCaptMandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. We need to re-set the frame
This is the worst sort of eugenics.

It's not mere chance that all these babies are lily white. I'm guessing gender was pre-selected, too.

We need a program to offer "Kilimanjaro Snowflakes" to nice, white Congressfamilies. Watch 'em RUN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. whoa. what a load of stereotyping
sorry, that made my head spin so fast I am at a loss as to where to start.

MMMMm....I need some morning coffee.


I agree that chimpboy hand-selected rich white republican families to be spokesmodels. However, I don't get from there to "slutty white girls having sex before finishing puberty", without having to make several bus transfers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. being part of a couple that struggled with infertility, I find your
comments offensive in the extreme. Neither I nor my wife were "whitebread sluts".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. there are always variables.. no intention to insult you.. i am sorry for
Edited on Fri Jul-21-06 09:00 AM by sam sarrha
suffering.. sh*t happens.. i cant get a job, we cant have fair elections.

there are no guarantees in life... for anything even breath tomorrow, or the end of this day.

life is short, i had a family a prefect 2 year old child, my wife ran off with a drug dealer and 2 hookers with our child 26 years ago and i have never seen him since. I know what loss is. my second wife is infertile and we dont want children, we have puppies instead.

but other people need to know that sexual activity at an early age can be catastrophic and that may have nothing to do with you. there are many reason for infertility. ..dont let wanting something you dont have destroy the happiness you have now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrpCaptMandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
23. Who said you were?
Did I say "whitebread sluts?" No, I didn't. Did you? Yes, you did. So save your outrage for someone else. I'm not buying. Try reading with your eyes instead of your emotions.

I took the previous post to be a comment on the failures of the Christian Right (that's who's participating in this little "Snowflake" eugencics experiment) to teach their children, thus leading to fertility problems, teen pregnancies, sexually transmitted diseases and even death.

Instead of getting offended "in the extreme," why don't you try looking at the issue presented?

Jeez!

Some people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. try reading your own post I responded to.
"The whitebreads are having trouble reproducing because of profoundly trashy promiscuity in their early years"

is from your post, is it not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrpCaptMandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. Try reproducing the entire sentence next time
It will make folks at least take a look at your flameage. As it is, you just come across as profoundly hyper-sensitive. What sort of ego makes you think the discussion was about you? <Cue Carly Simon: "You're So Vain.">

By the way: now find the word "slut" you attributed to me. Go ahead. I can wait. Oops! You can't. But you quoted me as saying "whitebread sluts." I didn't.

Apology accepted in advance.

Still, is there, or is there not a rather serious issue with regard to the failure of the Right-wingers and their dirt-ignorant "abstinence-only" problems?

The issue here isn't your sense of "outrage," no matter how hard you try to make it so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. my apologies.
I interpreted "profoundly trashy promiscuity" as meaning "sluts".
Thanks for correcting me on that.

at any rate, I DO owe this apology: I was reacting to another poster's characterizations rather than yours.
The other poster appeared to be making broad generalizations about people with infertility problems, that I felt offended by.

If you were not making similar bigoted remarks, but I thought you were, I apologize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrpCaptMandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Thank you
The greatest issue (thusfar un-remarked upon by the MSM or anyone else that I'm aware of) is that this "snowflake" program smacks of eugenics. And that's beyond wrong. The uniform "whiteness" of these children shows clearly that they were pre-selected based upon race.

We need to discuss this. It's a little peephole in the right-wing America's vision for the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. We can discuss it
without resorting to sexist and racist stereotypes.

I don't appreciate being informed that I'm probably a slut with fertility problems, because I'm a white woman.

So, young white women are viewed as promiscuous. To me, that explains a lot about race relations between the sexes. I'd dare say that's worth discussing, while we're at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrpCaptMandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. Wrong guy
Check the posts. Draw in your horns. I was elaborating on the position put forward by another.

Try again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. so....you counter stereotyping with more stereotyping? mmmmmkay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. under 18.. isn't stereotyping.. you are like talking to my X-wife.. and if
that is stereotyping .. well sometimes stereotyping is accurate, a broken clock is right twice a day
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. "they chased white girls because they were easy.. they like to F*** "
that is the part I'm referring to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. OH... That... that was a "Quote"... sorry, and i heard it a lot , reality
Edited on Fri Jul-21-06 10:40 AM by sam sarrha
seems too hard for you.. if it isn't your reality..

i was a Juvenile Parole Officer.. i worked in the office, in the field, and in the prison.

i was also the Emergency Services Coordinator for the North Olympic Peninsula, i have worked with the poor and the disenfranchised, the mentally ill.. i have seen the worst of it.

there are all kinds of kids, people tend to be born with their own personalities, i am 180 degrees different than my brother.. he was a police Caption, red neck, locke em up throw away the key.. i was a Juvenile parole officer and i taught meditation in prison and in my office, i mediated in the schools for them, i tutored them after school, we had a study group, i taught them learning systems, their parents came into my office and cried and thanked me for helping then pass school... i tried to understand cause and effect, i found several kids that had hypoglycemia or Candida Albacans and their behavior was triggered by mood swings die to sugar.. we wrote in their parole contract they couldn't drink coke with sugar or eat candy.. we made them read books to educate them.
it isn't likely many will change, but if we can educate them to use condoms, and the benefit to abstinence or at least being selective sexually in some cases.. lots of suffering can be avoided.

one delinquent girl statistically will cause you more trouble than 10 or 15 boys, we had 14 girls in our active files.. there were two parole officers. a mother comes in in a frenzy dragging her 14 year old girl.. she is furious and holds up a 2 foot long strip of condoms..:wow: :rofl: in a fit of disgust shakes them at me. i asked the girl if she used them... she said yes.. i asked do you use them every time.? she said yes, i nodded and looked at the mother and shrugged my shoulders.
i explained that as long as her partners are under 18 there is no law broken..

i dont care what they do, i dont have a moral problem with it.. i just worry

the use of colorful language is a parody of others attitudes which carries some truth. i cant even spell promisquiss.. it's silly. my wife was very popular, i competed for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #16
35. It's also called painting with a broad brush.
Disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
34. is this an attempt at humor?
it isn't funny, BTW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
31. Choosing what your baby looks like is eugenics?
I'm sure there are some black snowflakes. African Americans and people progressive enough not to care about the race of thier baby are overwhelmingly Dems, so of course they would not attend a * stunt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cyrano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. Right after the photo, Bush ordered her to be taken out and shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. No, probably tortured though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is what happens whey you adopt a talking embryo
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. And why don't the bushes adopt one, two or six?
Or anyone of those wacko repuke congress critters? Each repuke who voted against the bill should be required to adopt about 18 of those snow flakes. With the thousands of frozen blastocyst, they need to get moving to get them all turned into real live babies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
26. Put the twins to workdoing something productive for a change
instead of partying with the rich boys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. why do you think they really call them "snowflakes"...? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. no 2 are alike and they are all white..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
11. That's how one Flake salutes another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
12. Snowflakes = The Boys From Brazil
No Less Than Genetic Engineering For A Master Race
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
18. in china there are villages of Thousands of only men.. NO WOMEN.! i bet
they wont ban gay marrage in china
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
19. Good one kid..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grateful581 Donating Member (760 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
20. I think we found a future DU member n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
25. LynneSin, you say me!
IT is so hypocritical that these people are so onboard with the science to create these embryos for suffering childless couples, but can't appreciate that they are destroyed before they are even a week old for the benefit of science, before there is even a heartbeat. Isn't that one of the anti-choice bumperstickers?: "Abortion stops a beating heart." I guess they can't use that one for this purpose.

"W, the best part of you ran down your momma's crack." (yeah, it's disgusting, but it's how I feel right now.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom_Aflaim Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
28. Snowflake baby?
Edited on Fri Jul-21-06 11:43 AM by Freedom_Aflaim
Is that a racial slur of some sort?

I've never heard that term before.

FWIW, even if its not a racial slur, and I grant the OP all the benefit of the doubt, it kinda sounds that way to my naive ears.

I mean, shes a baby for Gods sake. (and I do think its funny shes making fun of Bush)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. It's what the Rethugs are calling them.
Snowflake Babies are their name for babies that were adopted as frozen embryos. Oddly enough, they're also all white as snowflakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom_Aflaim Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. I see txs,
There's alot there that makes me uncomfortable.

As I mentioned the name makes me uncomfortable, but what you describe is even worse.

Pre-adoption? what the hell. Adoption is a good and viable choice for parents who want to raise children (who cant for medical reasons), and for mothers to be who choose not the have an abortion, but find themselves in trouble.

I dunno, but this form of adoption makes me uncomfortable.

Nonetheless, the child is pretty innocent, and in this case she seems to have the right instincts :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrpCaptMandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #30
40. It's not "adoption"
That's how the Repigs are framing it.

What it is is one of the most blatant, shocking, overt acts of eugenics to come down the path in literally decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #28
38. this thread is chock full of racial slurs and sexism.
(Much of it already got deleted, thankfully).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
37. Because when bush talks about an issue ...
that is suppose to be about something good, honest and achieving some wealth its about whites. Bush also believes that the only people in this country who really matter are white.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC