Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Iraq as a political project is finished," a top gov official told Reuters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 11:40 AM
Original message
"Iraq as a political project is finished," a top gov official told Reuters
Mosques bombed, tense Baghdad under curfew
By Ahmed Rasheed and Mariam Karouny

.......................

On the eve of a high-profile meeting intended to demonstrate reconciliation among sectarian and ethnic factions ahead of a White House visit by the prime minister, senior leaders admitted to despair about the chances of averting all-out civil war.

"Iraq as a political project is finished," a top government official told Reuters -- anonymously because the coalition of Shi'ite Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki remains committed in public to a U.S.-sponsored constitution preserving Iraq's unity.

"The parties have moved to Plan B," the official said, saying Sunni, ethnic Kurdish and majority Shi'ite blocs were looking at ways to divide power and resources and to solve the conundrum of Baghdad's mixed population of seven million.

"There is serious talk of Baghdad being divided into east and west," said the official, who has long been a proponent of the present government's objectives. "We are extremely worried."


more at:
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=topNews&storyID=2006-07-21T144652Z_01_L10437415_RTRUKOC_0_US-IRAQ.xml&archived=False
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good going, GOPranos!


:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. who didn't see this coming. oh, bushco, forgot... they can't see anything
realistically because they're so busy trying to appease their little boot-stamping thug prezdunt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I'm not sure that they'd even care if they could be made to see it
what they are concerned about is planting 100,000+ US troops in the center of the world's biggest oil patch. Iraq can go fuck itself, erupt into civil war, become a dictatorship or a failed state with no government at all. In fact it would be just as pleasing to Bushco or maybe more pleasing even, if all Iraqis were to suddenly die. Then we'd have no friction with the local population as we squat on the world's oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. Ya, those PNACers little political project is kaput.
What now? Will they take up knitting for a hobby? Or will they start another war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. John Negroponte wins!!!!
....I can't find the more current article from a few weeks ago, so this will have to do until I can post it:

<snip>
Negroponte's 'Serious Setback'
By Dahr Jamail
t r u t h o u t | Perspective

Friday 03 March 2006

John Negroponte, the US National Intelligence Director, provided testimony on Tuesday at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on "global threats."

Negroponte, who was the US ambassador to Iraq from June 2004 to April 2005, was immediately promoted to his current position after his presence in Iraq. Ironically, he warned the committee on Tuesday, "If chaos were to descend upon Iraq or the forces of democracy were to be defeated in that country ... this would have implications for the rest of the Middle East region and, indeed, the world."

Warning of the outcome of a possible civil war in Iraq, Negroponte said sectarian civil war in Iraq would be a "serious setback" to the global war on terror. Note - he did not say it would be a "serious setback" to the Iraqi people, over 1,400 of whom have been slaughtered in sectarian violence touched off by the bombing of the Golden Mosque last week in Samarra.

No, the violence and instability in Iraq would be a "serious setback" to the global "war on terror."

But it's interesting for him to continue, "The consequences for the people of Iraq would be catastrophic," whilst feigning his concern. Because generating catastrophic consequences for civilian populations just happens to be his specialty.

If we briefly review the political history of John Negroponte, we find a man who has had a career bent toward generating civilian death and widespread human rights abuses, and promoting sectarian and ethnic violence. <more>

http://www.truthout.org/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/48/18107


Hold on, I found the current one:

http://www.aljazeera.com/me.asp?service_ID=11542


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zippy890 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. uh oh, serious setback to 'war on terror'
wonder what plan B is going to be from our government.

*sinking feeling*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. There will be no oil gotten out of Iraq
those days are over...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. Iraq is irrelevant to the Republicans.
They did what they set out to do. They stole billions of dollars, shifted the balance of wealth and political power in this country, took control of the media, stacked the courts in their favor and took control of the elective process.

Iraq had nothing to do with American security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC