Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Zogby-Blacks DON"T want voting rights for ex-felons?!?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
booley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 01:32 PM
Original message
Zogby-Blacks DON"T want voting rights for ex-felons?!?
Can someone confirm or deny this?

While Senators Hillary Clinton (D-NY) and John Kerry (D-MA) attempt to push a bill through the Senate that would restore voting rights for felons -- including killers, rapists and child predators -- such a law would receive a cold reception by most Americans, according to a just-released poll. And some believe Clinton and Kerry -- with the help of some news organizations -- are trying to sneak their bill under the public radar.

A new poll conducted by Zogby Interactive for Associated Television News and The O'Leary Report shows that a clear majority of Americans, including blacks and Hispanics, are opposed to the restoration of voting rights for former felons.
   
The Zogby/Associated Television News poll findings show that Americans oppose aspects of the Count Every Vote Act sponsored by Senators Hillary Clinton and John Kerry that would restore the voting rights of former convicted felons. Fifty-three percent of the American public believes that such a law giving back the right to vote to felons is bad for the country.
..........
One reason given for the introduction of the Clinton/Kerry bill was to return a racial balance to the disproportionate number of blacks serving time in our prison system for felonies. Yet, 61% of blacks and 66% of Hispanics believe voting rights for felons should be returned on an individual basis and not as a class as the Clinton/Kerry bill would do.

One political strategist believes the push to give amnesty for illegal aliens and for felons is driven by the desire to increase the Democrat Party base.

"Whether they admit it or not, the Democrats need lawbreakers such as illegal aliens -- who are being illegally registered as Democrats -- and killers, rapists and robbers in order to increase their base of far-left voters," says Mike Baker, political strategist and pollster.


http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_27266027.shtml#

Now the writing of this guy seemed to be a bit..slanted to put it mildly. So I tried looking on Google and Zogby. But I can't find anything but other right wing blogs talkign about this. And NOTHING in Zogby's press releases and news.

Maybe I just missed it but this seems REALLY hard ot beleive. I mean, Blacks and Hispanics have had thier votes taken away so often and so aggresivly by the use of felon lists. I am sure they know how felon lists have been used against them and will be again. So why would they be against something that would help them?

But I do trust Zogby. But I can't find any evidence outside the right wing blog-o-sphere that any such poll exists. But I would like some kind of confirmation before I just discount this as another RW lie.

Any help would be appreciated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
patcox2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Its not the felons, its the purges of non-felons.
Its not likely that a lot of convicted felons vote anyway, the problem is with, for example, Florida's purge of the voting rolls which purged thousands of people who were not ex-convicts just because their names were similar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
booley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. yeah but
Florida was able to get away with this by saying they had to remove the 'felons"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Returned on an individual basis"
sounds reasonable to me, too, although it would likely be an understaffed and poorly considered process, just one more piece of paper for a PO to check when the parole was up.

Clearly, ex felons with no visible means of support are going to be up to something, while others are motivated to stay out of prison and are working hard at whatever shit job they've been able to get.

It would be nice if someone were to tell the difference and act accordingly. Felonies committed in youth shouldn't strip adults who have become responsible citizens of their rights. That is just plain wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Duh what just what Jebbie did in Florida,, cut the Staff and $$$ for
the agency that did the review. And the there was a major backlog....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
booley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. But Jeb's friends got through
Just not the regular folks. Especially if they werent' really folons in the first place.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. 'On an individual basis' is wide open to abuse.
If, as many of us contend, the system is set up to disenfranchise minorities, what better way to increase the disparity than allowing white, repub leaning felons to regain the vote, while routinely denying the same to black and latino felons.

I personally believe that anyone who's done his time should be allowed to rejoin society, and regain the vote. Those who are career criminals will be back inside quickly enough that they will make no real difference to any outcomes. Those who are not, deserve it. Unless, of course, their felony was vote tamperin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Poorly worded....
If people understood, "Returned on an individual basis" means sitting in an IN-BOX 10-15 years, I do not think they would have voted for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
booley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. Can anyone find me a link for the poll itself?
I certainly trust Zogby more then some right wing blog.

At the moment, i think this is all Bushit. but I am trying to get confirmation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. The only reference i can find for the poll or the bill are this
same story written by Jim Kouri that's posted on several different blogs.
I don't the the bill or the poll exist.

This Jim Kouri person needs to be researched.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't think the bill exists.
I can't find it on Kerry's or Clinton's sites, or even on the Senate website:
http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/legislative/b_three_sections_with_teasers/active_leg_page.htm

Looks like more Swiftboating to me. Matbe we should report this to Media Matters and see what they can find out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SensibleAmerican Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Why would blacks want ex-felons to vote?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. Dunno about the poll, but...
the Count Every Vote Act is very real:

http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oId=18049

As far as the poll goes, my observations of blacks and hispanics are that they tend to be pretty hardcore anti-crime and anti-felon. They have far more direct experience with crime than the rest of us do, and are sick of it. You'd think blacks would be pretty much against capital punishment, too, because of racial disparities in sentencing, but that's not how it works when you stand a good chance of your kid getting shot in a driveby.

The threats to minority voting are one thing, but hammering felons is something else entirely. The two aren't necessarily related to someone who has to walk through gang territory every day.

Other than that, the spin doctors are no doubt hard at work having a good ol' time with this.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. I think you might find these links of interest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC