Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democratic Leaders call on * to DISCUSS ties to Jack Abramoff

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:23 PM
Original message
Democratic Leaders call on * to DISCUSS ties to Jack Abramoff
Sorry if this is a dupe, but could not find in search....

DEMOCRATIC LEADERS CALL ON BUSH TO DISCUSS ADMINISTRATION TIES TO JACK ABRAMOFF

Tuesday, January 17, 2006


Washington, DC -- Today, Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid, Assistant Senate Democratic Leader Richard Durbin, Senate Democratic Campaign Committee Chairman Charles Schumer and Senate Democratic Conference Secretary Debbie Stabenow, wrote President Bush asking him to explain the White House’s numerous connections to indicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff and to disclose further un-known ties so that the American people can be assured that the White House is not for sale.

The full text of the letter follows below:


January 17, 2006

The Honorable George W. Bush
1600 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
Washington, DC 20500


Dear Mr. President:


The Justice Department is currently investigating the web of corruption surrounding lobbyist Jack Abramoff. Even at this early stage of the investigation, there is reason to believe that Mr. Abramoff may have had undue and improper influence within your Administration. There is no reason to wait for indictments or convictions before the American people learn of the role Mr. Abramoff played in the Bush White House. We therefore call on you to make public as soon as possible an accounting of Mr. Abramoff’s personal contacts with Bush Administration officials and the official acts that may have been undertaken at his request.


Some of Mr. Abramoff’s ties to the White House have already been reported in the press. For example, it is well known that Mr. Abramoff was a prodigious Republican fundraiser who attained the rank of “Pioneer” after raising over $100,000 for the 2004 Bush-Cheney reelection campaign. You have returned $6,000 of that money, but have not answered the question of what benefits, if any, were extended to Mr. Abramoff on account of his Pioneer status.


It has also been reported that Mr. Abramoff served as an adviser to your transition team and that you met with him personally. The American people have a right to know how many times you and senior staff met with Abramoff, and what benefits, if any, Abramoff received from this high degree of access.


In addition, it has been reported that your Administration removed a federal prosecutor who was investigating Mr. Abramoff’s secret lobbying contract with court officials in the U.S. territory of Guam. Indeed, the prosecutor was replaced only one day after he issued a subpoena for records, and the case was subsequently dropped. The Guam public auditor has since concluded that territory officials paid Mr. Abramoff, via a third party, a total of $324,000 in smaller increments in an effort to circumvent the requirement of a sealed bid. Did the White House exert any improper influence on behalf of Mr. Abramoff in this case?


Finally, David Safavian, who served as the chief procurement officer in your Administration, was recently charged with obstructing Senate and executive branch investigations into whether he aided Mr. Abramoff in efforts to acquire property controlled by the General Services Administration. Were other White House officials aware of Mr. Safavian’s ties to Abramoff, and did those ties play a role in Safavian’s appointment to a high-ranking Administration position?


While the above-described connections between Abramoff and the Bush Administration have been reported, others remain unknown. For example, Americans have a right to more information about Abramoff’s role in the “K Street Project,” the initiative launched by Republicans in the1990’s to link lobbyists to Republican officials in Congress and the executive branch. What role did your Administration play in the K Street Project, and did White House officials have direct contact with Abramoff in this regard?


In the upcoming State of the Union address, you will presumably call for reforms to address lobbying abuses. But such rhetoric will ring hollow until you reveal the ways in which Jack Abramoff himself may have improperly influenced your Administration over the past five years. As the leader of your party, you have the opportunity to set an example and call for openness and accountability from your fellow Republicans. The American people need to be assured that the White House is not for sale.


Sincerely,


Harry Reid
Richard Durbin
Debbie Stabenow
Charles Schumer

http://reid.senate.gov/record2.cfm?id=250467
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow - That's positively Conyers-esque!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Safavian connection
This is important, and symbolic. The whole thing was a big revolving door between the lobbyist firms and the offices of GOP congressmen and this administration.

We have to make sure this story is out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Any media coverage of this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
24. What do you think??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. K'd and R'd!
Let the truth be told ... finally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's On the Public Record
here are all waiting....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bostonbabs Donating Member (465 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oceansaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. Touche !!..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bread_and_roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. Wow #2 - This is seriously amazing
I haven't been able to watch any news today - has this been reported at all? Seems eminently newsworthy to me that Senators are asking for assurances that "the WH is not for sale"!! Or is it only Presidents being queried about BJs that is newsworthy?

I complain often enough to Schumer; I'll make a point of calling tomorrow to express appreciation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyedyeto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. Will there ever be any reply?
I doubt it. Remember.... Scotty, the * spokesman, said the chimp had never really met Abramoff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. There would be if they all went on TV and demanded it...
Edited on Tue Jan-17-06 10:46 PM by Dr Fate
And follow up with "If the president refuses to respond, then it proves he is hiding somthing. I think he should answer the question under oath, frankly..."

The GOP talking heads would be "fooled" into expressing "outrage" at the blunt comments, making more excuses for Bush, thus furthering the echo and high-lighting the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyedyeto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Will that ever happen?
Considering that corporate media these days is decidedly to the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Are you suggesting that Wolf Blitzer is holding a gun to them?
Edited on Tue Jan-17-06 11:14 PM by Dr Fate
How does the corporate media keep top, household name DEMs from saying whatever they want on their various TV appearances that I see them on every week????

Are they banning them or editing their sound clips? If so, then please show me where the DEM who they did this to says so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyedyeto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Show me how many Dems vs repugs they have on ...
CNN, MSNBC, FAUX et al. If you can show that there is a 50-50 representation, then I'll discuss a fair and balanced media with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. I agree with you. How does that keep them from making blunt statements?
Edited on Wed Jan-18-06 12:25 AM by Dr Fate
How does the unbalanced ratio keep top, household name DEMs from going on those TV news shows that I see them on and saying:

"We challnege Bush to go under oath and answer some questions about Abramoff-we think he is lying about this too..." or whatever.

The issue is not whether the media is biased, it is. The issue is ways to fight it instead of pulling it out as an excuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
10. Are they saying this on TV shows, or is this for donors ears only?
Edited on Tue Jan-17-06 10:42 PM by Dr Fate
Are they saying this on TV, or is this another cry into the internet ether to make us think they are directly taking on Bush?

LETTERS? What is this, 1890?

How about that new invention they call "the TV"????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Good point!
They could go down to the telegraph office perhaps and each send a message while waiting for the train.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. They need to put down the quills & ink and get on the God-damned TV.
Hey, all for all you DEMS who wont donate because you think we are not fighting- LOOK- we wrote a letter!!!

Yeah- great. Letters. Now get your ass on TV in front of the swing-voters and I'll think about opening my check-book again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. I always cringe when I see the word "honorable" before bush's name.
Some DU'ers expressed dismay, understandably, that the Abramoff scandal would not have legs. By now, I'm wondering if bush has nightmares of giant centipedes that spring out of a "jack-in-the-box" toy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sadie5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Can someone please post again
the information concerning the Dems affiliation with Abramoff and that they took no money. There was a thread earlier today but I can't find it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
14. The WH is not for sale...
It's more like illegal rent. Eviction time.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
15. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Twist_U_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
16. waste of ink
its already in the trash with everything else thats been sent since 2000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Along with the Constitution and all of American history up to 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. "ink"- indeed. How 1890's of them. n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
23. I'm not going to hold my breath for a response
I give them effort though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
26. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpgamerd00d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
27. The "Made Men" of the AbraMafia.

Jack Abramoff - Don Vito Corleone
Tom DeLay - Don Michael Corleone
Michael Scanlon - Calo, the loyal Sicilian bodyguard
Bob Ney - Fredo Corleone
Alberto Gonzales - Tom Hagen

Who else will "star" in this gripping drama ?

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greiner3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
29. All that will happen is b*** will say;
Nobody's home, from behind a closed door!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC