|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-21-06 07:43 PM Original message |
Why do we have the fourth amendment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-21-06 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
1. I must note I am not being hostile, but I am really kind of doing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MnFats (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-21-06 07:52 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. because the 'authorities' could barge in anywhere they wanted.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant_wait_for_2008 (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-21-06 09:01 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. There really are no 4th amendment rights anymore since 9/11.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MnFats (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 02:55 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. yeah... 41 shots....welcome to DU, too n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-21-06 07:55 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. It is supposed to be a barrier to outright tyranny. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevedeshazer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-21-06 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
2. Because thugs employed by King George III were set loose on the Colonists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-21-06 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
3. Just to keep everyone on track |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-21-06 07:51 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. The 4th Amendment has been vetoed by BushCo and HLS anyway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mike Niendorff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-21-06 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
4. Argh. misread, self-delete. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
politicat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-21-06 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
8. Because we needed something between 3 and 5? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:59 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC