Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Congress Should Sue Bush" American Bar Association

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-22-06 01:17 AM
Original message
"Congress Should Sue Bush" American Bar Association
George W. Bush did not invent the document known as the presidential signing statement; he inherited it. Franklin Roosevelt, Bill Clinton, and even James Monroe, in 1830, authored the statements, which spell out the president's sometimes controversial interpretation of the very law he's signing. But no president has used signing statements quite like Bush.

Although the president has not issued more statements in total than any other president, he has challenged more than 750 laws in more than 100 signing statements. And he has used them to, in effect, challenge parts of laws, and challenge them more aggressively, than any president before him. Bush's liberal use of those statements first attracted attention in December 2005, when he signed a torture ban—but then added a statement reserving the right not to enforce the ban, alongside his signature. Since then, Congress has held a hearing to investigate Bush's use of the statements, a bipartisan advocacy group has condemned their use, and Democratic Rep. Barney Frank has introduced a bill that would allow Congress to override content in them that contradicts signed legislation.

Now, U.S. News has learned, an American Bar Association task force is set to suggest even stronger action. In a report to be released Monday, the task force will recommend that Congress pass legislation providing for some sort of judicial review of the signing statements. Some task force members want to simply give Congress the right to sue over the signing statements; other task force members will not characterize what sort of judicial review might ultimately emerge.

To mount a legal case, a person or group must have been granted "standing," or the right to file a lawsuit. Current law does not grant members of Congress such a right, and recent Supreme Court decisions have denied it in all but very exceptional cases. But Congress could consider bypassing that hurdle by writing a law to give its members the right to sue, a resolution in the task force's report declares, a source familiar with the task force report told U.S. News.

more at: http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060721/21signing.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-22-06 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is awesome news.
In other words...impeach the treasonous, rat bastard!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-22-06 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-22-06 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good, thank you fo this news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-22-06 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes
and of course, yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pierogi_Pincher Donating Member (323 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-22-06 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yay! Some GOOD news!
C'mon and DO IT!

P_P

:dem:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reckon Donating Member (729 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-22-06 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. Congress pass legislation to stop * ??
Edited on Sat Jul-22-06 02:43 AM by Reckon
They're kidding right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-22-06 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Well, we'd have to wait until January 2007. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-22-06 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. Sounds good to me. I think we should get rid of Kings.
They are fun to read about in history only. Rulers that God gave power to are gone in my mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-22-06 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. "Uh - I don't think so." - Congress
At least not this current Congress. And CERTAINLY not this Chairman of the Judiciary - Specter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-22-06 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
10. Conyers already did this. I wish the rest of the spineless cong had joined
him. Ah well, hope springs eternal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC