On Sunday in a column entitled "The Passion of the Embryos," New York Times columnist Frank Rich blasts President Bush's decision to use his first veto on a bill passed by both Houses which would have expanded federal funding for embryonic stem cell research, RAW STORY has learned.
(snip)
"Placing his profound religious convictions above the pagan narcissism of Americans hoping for cures to diseases like Parkinson's and diabetes, he decreed restrictions to shackle the advance of medical science," Rich writes.
Excerpts from Rich's Sunday NY Times column:
That the administration's stem-cell policy is a political fiasco for its proponents is evident from a single fact: Bill Frist, the most craven politician in Washington, ditched the president. In past pandering to his party's far-right fringe, Frist, who calls himself a doctor, misdiagnosed the comatose Terri Schiavo's condition after watching her on videotape and, in an interview with ABC's George Stephanopoulos, refused to dispute an abstinence program's canard that tears and sweat could transmit AIDS. If Frist is belatedly standing up for stem-cell research, you can bet he's read some eye-popping polls. His ignorance about HIV notwithstanding, he also knows that the facts about stem cells are not on Bush's side.
....
Tacticians in both political parties have long theorized that if a conservative Supreme Court actually struck down Roe v. Wade, it would set Republicans back at the polls for years. Bush's canonization of clumps of frozen cells over potential cancer cures may jump-start that backlash. We'll see this fall. Already one Republican senatorial candidate, Michael Steele of Maryland, has stepped in Bush's moral morass by egregiously comparing stem-cell research to Nazi experiments on Jews during the Holocaust.
more
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Frank_Rich_The_Passion_of_embryos_0722.html