Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MTP: Free Elections do not lead to democracy!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 10:38 AM
Original message
MTP: Free Elections do not lead to democracy!!



Tim Russert:

We have seen free eletions in Iraq -- now the speaker of the assembly calls us "Butchers"
We have free elections in Palestine -- and Hamas wins.
Free elections in Lebanon -- Hezbollah gets significant representation in the Lebanese government -- and not this war


It looks like free elections do not lead to democracy? What do we do about this?

----------


Was this just a verbal slip? You could of course promote rigged elections as in the U.S. and Mexico -- a good North American tradition!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. War is peace
Edited on Sun Jul-23-06 10:41 AM by SpiralHawk
Ignorance is strength.

Hate is love.

Big BushCo -- and its corporate propagandist puppets -- love you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. What no mention of Chavez, Timmy must be slipping...
He also did not mention Bush* but I guess that was just soo obvious he didn't feel he nbeeded to..:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. russert is just stupid. unfortunate for someone in news.
of course free elections (and the adherence to them) are the definition of democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. What he means is ....
Free elections don't give us governments run by either puppets or fascists so let's stop allowing free elections, they are too dangerous and we might as well start at home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Start?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. ROFL, excellent point, finish would have been more accurate! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. In the 1960s in a country I know well
members of select elite families, staff from the Briitish & US embassy as well as trusted people in the catholic church would spend election day marking ballots (and drinking scotch) for the late afternoon stuffing.

I saw a lot of things as a child.:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. LOL, I honestly haven't heard of ballot stuffing in Canada, although
there certainly were indications of non-counting of ballots during the last Quebec referendum on separation, but we DO have an unbelievable number of paved roads in the Maritimes that go nowhere, lol. In Canada, it was paved roads that bought the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. This was in a Caribbean Country
I kid you not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Wow, it seems the practice has spread far and wide....
given the various accusations of ballot stuffing in elections around the world. Not a new practice but, hopefully, one that will not be allowed to let slip by anymore. At least some countries in Europe, rumsfeld's "new Europe", the people are fighting back against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. The Brits and Americans have been
doing this for ages in Latin America and the Caribbean, but they always need the army (in Latin America), local Chambers of Commerce, accepted political parties, elite families (you know those who feel really important dining with the queen or the American ambassador) and the good old catholic church.

If that doesn't work they divide and rule (guns arrive by the thousands) and let different working class groups devour themselves while they maintain control and continue to dine and drink scotch. They don't care who dies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. In reality, not much has changed it seems
Divide and conquer is still the rule and the 1% elite still control the strings.

Sad, sad world we live in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
5. Actually, I agre that free elections do not necessarily lead to democracy.
Edited on Sun Jul-23-06 11:19 AM by Jim__
Although I disagree with his reasons. It's not because we (outsiders) may disagree with the result of an election; but because it is possible to set up an electin process in a nation, have almost every eligible voter in the nation freely cast their vote; and still not have democracy. if the people casting their votes are not ready to accept the results of the election; then, the follow-up to the election will probably not be a democratic government but some form of fighting for power.

Even if the elections we held in Iraq were completely free; I do not believe that the people of Iraq were willing to accept the results of the election. I don't believe that Iraq is a democracy today; whether or not it had free elections back in January.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
7. Free elections lead to democracy, but not necessarily one US likes.
The US has been hypocritical on spreading democracy since the late 19th century. We're all for democracy as long as it suits our needs, but once that democracy asserts itself contrary to the "democracy" we like, then it's an issue.

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. bingo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. Not to mention, does unprovoked, aggresion/invasion (not lead to democracy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. Only in George's wet dreams.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. In other words
He is justifying the rigged elections that we have in our country.
And Bushco is just "saving us from ourselves".:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. Translation: "democracy"="constant loyalty to US in all ways"
including allowing US to control land, markets, resources, and people even to the point that the people of one's nation die from US use and abuse.

THAT IS what the US ruling class believes IS "democracy"


Killing Hope. Over 250 Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II...by William Blum (ex-CIA)

If you flip over the rock of American foreign policy of the past century, this is what crawls out ... invasions ... bombings ... overthrowing governments ... suppressing movements for social change ... assassinating political leaders ... perverting elections ... manipulating labor unions ...manufacturing "news" ... death squads ...torture ... biological warfare ...depleted uranium ... drug trafficking ...mercenaries ...

It's not a pretty picture.
It is enough to give imperialism a bad name.

Read the full details in:
Killing Hope - Over 250 Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II by William Blum

"Far and away the best book on the topic." Noam Chomsky

Table of Contents
Introduction
1. China - 1945 to 1960s: Was Mao Tse-tung just paranoid?
2. Italy - 1947-1948: Free elections, Hollywood style
3. Greece - 1947 to early 1950s: From cradle of democracy to client state
4. The Philippines - 1940s and 1950s: America's oldest colony
5. Korea - 1945-1953: Was it all that it appeared to be?
6. Albania - 1949-1953: The proper English spy
7. Eastern Europe - 1948-1956: Operation Splinter Factor
8. Germany - 1950s: Everything from juvenile delinquency to terrorism
9. Iran - 1953: Making it safe for the King of Kings
10. Guatemala - 1953-1954: While the world watched
11. Costa Rica - Mid-1950s: Trying to topple an ally - Part 1
12. Syria - 1956-1957: Purchasing a new government
13. Middle East - 1957-1958: The Eisenhower Doctrine claims another backyard for America
14. Indonesia - 1957-1958: War and pornography
15. Western Europe - 1950s and 1960s: Fronts within fronts within fronts
16. British Guiana - 1953-1964: The CIA's international labor mafia
17. Soviet Union - Late 1940s to 1960s: From spy planes to book publishing
18. Italy - 1950s to 1970s: Supporting the Cardinal's orphans and techno-fascism
19. Vietnam - 1950-1973: The Hearts and Minds Circus
20. Cambodia - 1955-1973: Prince Sihanouk walks the high-wire of neutralism
21. Laos - 1957-1973: L'Armée Clandestine
22. Haiti - 1959-1963: The Marines land, again
23. Guatemala - 1960: One good coup deserves another
24. France/Algeria - 1960s: L'état, c'est la CIA
25. Ecuador - 1960-1963: A text book of dirty tricks
26. The Congo - 1960-1964: The assassination of Patrice Lumumba
27. Brazil - 1961-1964: Introducing the marvelous new world of death squads
28. Peru - 1960-1965: Fort Bragg moves to the jungle
29. Dominican Republic - 1960-1966: Saving democracy by getting rid of democracy
30. Cuba - 1959 to 1980s: The unforgivable revolution
31. Indonesia - 1965: Liquidating President Sukarno ... and 500,000 others
East Timor - 1975: And 200,000 more
32. Ghana - 1966: Kwame Nkrumah steps out of line
33. Uruguay - 1964-1970: Torture -- as American as apple pie
34. Chile - 1964-1973: A hammer and sickle stamped on your child's forehead
35. Greece - 1964-1974: "Fuck your Parliament and your Constitution," said
the President of the United States
36. Bolivia - 1964-1975: Tracking down Che Guevara in the land of coup d'etat
37. Guatemala - 1962 to 1980s: A less publicized "final solution"
38. Costa Rica - 1970-1971: Trying to topple an ally -- Part 2
39. Iraq - 1972-1975: Covert action should not be confused with missionary work
40. Australia - 1973-1975: Another free election bites the dust
41. Angola - 1975 to 1980s: The Great Powers Poker Game
42. Zaire - 1975-1978: Mobutu and the CIA, a marriage made in heaven
43. Jamaica - 1976-1980: Kissinger's ultimatum
44. Seychelles - 1979-1981: Yet another area of great strategic importance
45. Grenada - 1979-1984: Lying -- one of the few growth industries in Washington
46. Morocco - 1983: A video nasty
47. Suriname - 1982-1984: Once again, the Cuban bogeyman
48. Libya - 1981-1989: Ronald Reagan meets his match
49. Nicaragua - 1981-1990: Destabilization in slow motion
50. Panama - 1969-1991: Double-crossing our drug supplier
51. Bulgaria 1990/Albania 1991: Teaching communists what democracy is all about
52. Iraq - 1990-1991: Desert holocaust
53. Afghanistan - 1979-1992: America's Jihad
54. El Salvador - 1980-1994: Human rights, Washington style
55. Haiti - 1986-1994: Who will rid me of this turbulent priest?
56. The American Empire - 1992 to present

Appendix I: This is How the Money Goes Round
Appendix II: Instances of Use of United States Armed Forces Abroad, 1798-1945
Appendix III: U. S. Government Assassination Plots
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. It's really that simple
and I wonder why people don't understand this. Defer to imperialism or die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. I've never thought free elections lead to democracy. Democracy is more
than voting. The population needs to be liberalized first or else you get a Palestine style election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. He's right but for the wrong reasons.
Democracy can only work when all sides accept legitimate election results. The problem in many 3rd world countries is that one grouo does not accept the elections, and therefore declares civil war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
17. Free elections are the characteristic feature of democracies
What Russert means is they don't always mean liberal democracies who respect the rule of law.

This is true, not all democracies are liberal, and not all respect the rule of law. In fact, historically, democracy has been considered and anti-liberal force that tends to fall into a tyranny of the majority or plurality over various passions of the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. That's the problem when you have someone with such a strong bias
Edited on Sun Jul-23-06 02:50 PM by The Backlash Cometh
calling the news for us. They are not objective enough to interpret what they see. They can't understand that people view abuses in different ways, and sometimes, voting for a Hamas or an Hezbollah is the way for the public to call for balance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
20. he forgot Bill Clinton
he meant to include, "we saw free elections in 1992 and we got that draft-dodging skirt-chasing Hillary-marrying liberal."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
21. So Russert is just now discovering this?
What a total loser, I knew this way back when I was taking political science 101. There are NO guarantees in life, PERIOD. Well one, but we all know what it is so no need to talk about it.

Russert = fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
27. That is democracy. Piss off a majority of the population and they'll elect
Edited on Mon Jul-24-06 08:16 AM by w4rma
folks who don't like you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC