Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reuters: **Rice calls for "urgent" ceasefire but Lebanon war rages on**

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 12:49 AM
Original message
Reuters: **Rice calls for "urgent" ceasefire but Lebanon war rages on**
Edited on Mon Jul-24-06 12:55 AM by chill_wind
Rice urges ceasefire but Lebanon war rages on
Sun Jul 23, 2006 11:36pm ET171

By Alaa Shahine

BEIRUT (Reuters) - U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice called for an urgent ceasefire between Israel and Hizbollah but the guerrilla group's leader on Monday vowed no let-up in missile attacks against the Jewish state.

Israeli warplanes pounded south Lebanon early on Monday after Hizbollah missiles hit northern Israel over the weekend.

Hizbollah's leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah said in remarks published on Monday that Israeli attacks would not halt the guerrilla group's rocket fire.

On a mission to avert full-scale war in the Middle East, Rice said there was an "urgent" need for a ceasefire in southern Lebanon but conditions had to be right.

more: http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=topNews&storyID=2006-07-24T033553Z_01_L21898716_RTRUKOC_0_US-MIDEAST.xml&WTmodLoc=NewsHome-C1-topNews-2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Conditional ceasefires don't work.
Both sides have big scary countries backing them. Conditions won't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. CNN poll on ceasefire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hold on! She said no ceasefire...only something that would
bring "lasting peace"! She was firm about "no ceasefire".

How is is they do a 180 and the media doesn't even blink? :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blonndee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. The "urgency" she purports to be expressing
is belied by her actions and her allegiances. What else is new. What a worthless POS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. Media got played, plain and simple.
She's not calling for an urgent ceasefire. She's saying a ceasefire is urgent but conditions which are not right, have to be right. In other words, Hezbollah's full and complete surrender and disarmament.

(crickets chirping)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. Rice on July 21
Edited on Mon Jul-24-06 01:31 AM by chill_wind
(...)

"We do seek an end to the current violence and we seek it urgently," said Ms Rice, who is leaving for the Middle East after the weekend for a round of diplomacy that will include visits to Israel and Italy.

"More than that, we seek an end to the root cause of the violence so that an enduring peace can be established.

"But if we look for a ceasefire that simply freezes the status quo ante, then we will be back here again in another six months, or nine months, or a year, looking for another ceasefire as Hezbollah uses southern Lebanon as a base to launch rockets against Israel."

Several hours earlier, Britain and the United States proposed a UN statement vowing to prepare conditions for a ceasefire, in the face of growing pressure to halt the fighting.

Criticism has mounted that the two countries are blocking the 15-nation Security Council from endorsing the UN secretary-general’s call for an immediate suspension of fighting.

(...)

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,11069-2280081,00.html

"Urgent" is just a sprinkled-in double-speak sound-byte.

(and why I put it in quotes)

edit to add: there appears to be missing pages 2 & 3 of Reuters story, I noticed on returning. If anyone finds another source, please post a link. I did a quick google and found nothing else so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC