Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Planned US Coal Plants Would Hike Warming - Group

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 02:04 AM
Original message
Planned US Coal Plants Would Hike Warming - Group
http://www.planetark.org/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/37367/story.htm

NEW YORK - If the more than 150 coal-fired power plants being planned in the United States were built it would boost coal demand 30 percent and raise national emissions of gases thought to cause global warming by 10 percent, according to an advocacy group.


The United States is seeing a boom in plans for coal-fired generation plants as natural gas prices trade at strong levels. Power plants built in the 1990s run almost exclusively on clean-burning natural gas which has increased demand for that fuel.
Recent proposed coal plants include TXU Corp.'s plan to build 11 in Texas and NRG Energy Inc.'s plans to build in Delaware and either New York or Connecticut.


more...
I think I'm going to get sick!!!
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. 150!?
OFHWAD

Oh fucking fuck.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 05:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. It gets even worse
Edited on Mon Jul-24-06 05:14 AM by theHandpuppet
Here's an article from the CSM in 2004:

http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/1223/p01s04-sten.html

New coal plants bury 'Kyoto'
New greenhouse-gas emissions from China, India, and the US will swamp cuts from the Kyoto treaty.
By Mark Clayton | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor
So much for Kyoto.

The official treaty to curb greenhouse-gas emissions hasn't gone into effect yet and already three countries are planning to build nearly 850 new coal-fired plants, which would pump up to five times as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as the Kyoto Protocol aims to reduce.
The magnitude of that imbalance is staggering. Environmentalists have long called the treaty a symbolic rather than practical victory in the fight against global warming. But even many of them do not appear aware of the coming tidal wave of greenhouse-gas emissions by nations not under Kyoto restrictions.

By 2012, the plants in three key countries - China, India, and the United States - are expected to emit as much as an extra 2.7 billion tons of carbon dioxide, according to a Monitor analysis of power-plant construction data. In contrast, Kyoto countries by that year are supposed to have cut their CO2 emissions by some 483 million tons.

The findings suggest that critics of the treaty, including the Bush administration, may be correct when they claim the treaty is hopelessly flawed because it doesn't limit emissions from the developing world. But they also suggest that the world is on the cusp of creating a huge new infrastructure that will pump out enormous amounts of CO2 for the next six decades.... MORE

And another article from the NYT, one that despite the optimism from certain quarters, tells me it's already too late to save the environment, partner.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/11/business/worldbusiness/11chinacoal.html?ex=1307678400en=e9ac1f6255a24fd8ei=5088partner=rssnytemc=rss&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1153735275-xhDYKIuR2a7oTpnHdJl/0w

(excerpt)

...Unless China finds a way to clean up its coal plants and the thousands of factories that burn coal, pollution will soar both at home and abroad. The increase in global-warming gases from China's coal use will probably exceed that for all industrialized countries combined over the next 25 years, surpassing by five times the reduction in such emissions that the Kyoto Protocol seeks.

(snipping)

The sulfur pollution is so pervasive as to have an extraordinary side effect that is helping the rest of the world, but only temporarily: It actually slows global warming. The tiny, airborne particles deflect the sun's hot rays back into space.

But the cooling effect from sulfur is short-lived. By contrast, the carbon dioxide emanating from Chinese coal plants will last for decades, with a cumulative warming effect that will eventually overwhelm the cooling from sulfur and deliver another large kick to global warming, climate scientists say. A warmer climate could lead to rising sea levels, the spread of tropical diseases in previously temperate climes, crop failures in some regions and the extinction of many plant and animal species, especially those in polar or alpine areas.

(snipping)

Already, China uses more coal than the United States, the European Union and Japan combined. And it has increased coal consumption 14 percent in each of the past two years in the broadest industrialization ever. Every week to 10 days, another coal-fired power plant opens somewhere in China that is big enough to serve all the households in Dallas or San Diego.

To make matters worse, India is right behind China in stepping up its construction of coal-fired power plants — and has a population expected to outstrip China's by 2030.... MORE

We are truly and deeply furked, people. And our current govt doesn't give a crap. If Al Gore had been elected Prez in 2000 maybe we could have addressed this little issue of extinction and also worked out some alternative plans that would satisfy the energy needs of both China and India. Many thanks to the Bush and Nader voters who helped to derail one of the last chances we had to save the planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. A kick for the morning crowd
We are screwed, folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. And what is really sad about this move
Is that we don't need coal, nuclear or gas fired plants to produce electricity. We have enough harvestable wind energy within three states to fulfill all of our electrical needs. We could place decentralized wind farms throughout our country and produce clean, renewable, and cost effective electrical energy without having to resort to polluting our atmosphere or contributing to global warming.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. China is doing the same...
...building more filthy coal plants. These maggots ought to be STOPPED dead in their tracks from building ANY plants that use coal or any fossil fuels at all. But TXU and NRG Energy are big bu$$$hco buds so no one will stop them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. COAL: our dirtiest four-letter word. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC