Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Army Weighs Blimp Fleet for Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 11:35 AM
Original message
U.S. Army Weighs Blimp Fleet for Iraq
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Army is researching the prospect of deploying airships to Iraq, both for surveillance as well as for troop transport.

Officials said the army has been briefed on the use of airships equipped with sensors that could provide continuous surveillance over insurgency strongholds in Iraq. The airships would ensure real-time information on insurgency threats to army commands and ease the burden on the Army's unmanned aerial vehicle fleet..

"The capability of an airship would be much greater than that of a tactical UAV," an official said. "We could be provided with a comprehensive situational awareness picture before patrols and other missions."

---snip

Another company, Blackwater USA, has presented a concept for a 120-foot airship packed with infrared sensors, CCD cameras and meant to provide reconnaissance for up to four days at a time. Executives said the 120-foot airship would be ready by the end of 2006.

http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/06/front2453879.073611111.html

---------------------

Hadn't seen this posted. Take it with a grain of salt if you like, but I couldn't resist.

While I love airships, this does not seem to be a particularly good idea. "Sitting duck" is the term that comes to mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. AAGGGH!!! Doesn't this sound like it should be filed next to a BATBOY
story????

How STOOOOOOOOOPID!!!

Dee dee dee!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. and who is going to pay for this shit? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. my, what attractive targets those things would make . . .
big, fat, slow, and flying low . . . you could probably take them out with rifle fire . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Even a nearsighted kid with a slingshot could hit a blimp
Maybe they could use lawn chairs and helium ballons as well??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. But consider the advertising revenue potential.
Buy Goodyear or We'll Call In An Air Strike.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. You gotta be fucking kidding me...
does the word HINDENBURG ring a bell? Christ, Rummy laughs off a question about why soldiers have out of date, busted, equipment, if they get what they need at all, and the DOD is spending billions on submarines that fire Marines out of the torpedo tubes(detailed in Armed Madhouse by Greg Palast) and now they want to build Zeppelins. I give up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravenseye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I'm assuming they'd use Helium instead of Hydrogen
So it wouldn't just incinerate in the air. Also I'd assume they'd be up pretty high and have a low heat signature. Taking one down would require some hefty anti-air hardware, and even then, those balloons can be so compartmentalized that they could propbably take a direct hit or two, and still fly.

Just sayin...It's totally fucked up, but the scary part is that it's doable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. What? You can shoot a blimp and it would still fly?
I would prefer to have more between me and those shoulder-held rockets insurgents like than a glorified balloon filled with Bush hot air. Holy crap!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravenseye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. Awesome! They could pay for it in advertising on the side for tires!
:sarcasm:

This totally reminds me of something out of a sci fi movie with an oppresive government...can't put my finger on it though...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. NSA wants to use the opportunity to field test them.





Soon to be deployed in DUers neighborhoods.

Those black helicopters and the Suburbans with the tinted glass are getting to be expensive. :eyes: :eyes:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. And, next, mule trains and muskets.
They really are getting desperate.

The "World's Mightiest Military" is doing a terrific job of proving it's total incompetance at fighting a guerilla war...again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. There's probably a role that blimps can play as UAV's. Kind of odd
that Blackwater is the contractor for these things though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
11. so Rush is going to Iraq?
sorry, couldn't resist...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC