Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Diebold, RFK Jr. and Abu Gonzales

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Vyan Donating Member (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 09:31 AM
Original message
Diebold, RFK Jr. and Abu Gonzales
Edited on Tue Jul-25-06 09:32 AM by Vyan
From OPedNews:


Recently, computer security expert Harri Hursti revealed serious security vulnerabilities in Diebold's software. According to Michael Shamos, a computer scientist and voting system examiner in Pennsylvania, "It's the most severe security flaw ever discovered in a voting system."


Even more shockingly, we learned recently that Diebold and the State of Maryland had been aware of these vulnerabilities for at least two years. They were documented in analysis, commissioned by Maryland and conducted by RABA Technologies, published in January 2004. For over two years, Diebold has chosen not to fix the security holes, and Maryland has chosen not to alert other states or national officials about these problems.


Basically, Diebold included a "back door" in its software, allowing anyone to change or modify the software. There are no technical safeguards in place to ensure that only authorized people can make changes.


Crossposted on Dailykos and Truth 2 Power


Deibold machines months ago were nearly kicked out of Maryland, and yet again we see why. As noted by the New York Times Editorial page:

Diebold, the electronic voting machine maker, suffered another sharp setback recently, when Maryland's House of Delegates voted 137-to-0 to drop its machines and switch to paper ballots. The vote came in the same week that Texas held elections marred by electronic voting troubles. Maryland's State Senate should join the House in voting to discontinue the use of the Diebold machines, and other states should follow Maryland's lead.


Maryland was one of the first states to embrace Diebold. But Maryland voters and elected officials have grown increasingly disenchanted as evidence has mounted that the machines cannot be trusted. In 2004, security experts from RABA Technologies told the state legislature that they had been able to hack into the machines in a way that would make it possible to steal an election. Senator Barbara Mikulski, a Democrat, informed the State Board of Elections in 2004 that voters had complained to her that machines had mysteriously omitted the Senate race.



The Op-ed peice goes on to echo what we've heard before from the Washington Post, the Oped report points out that it would only take the action of one person to change the outcome of an election - and that any such actions would be undetectable.


A malicious individual with access to a voting machine could rig the software without being detected. Worse yet, if the attacker rigged the machine used to compute the totals for some precinct, he or she could alter the results of that precinct. The only fix the RABA authors suggested was to warn people that manipulating an election is against the law.


This also displays how critical the issue of overnight storage which was raised following the Bilbray/Busby CA-50 election has become.


Op-ed continued:


Typically, modern voting machines are delivered several days before an election and stored in people's homes or in insecure polling stations. A wide variety of poll workers, shippers, technicians, and others who have access to these voting machines could rig the software. Such software alterations could be difficult to impossible to detect.


This past December during a test in Leon County Florida Diebold machines were successfully hacked and the "intrepeted code" problem brought to light by Election Supervisor Ion Sancho.


Ok, now to the worse part - Diebold officials admit that they've left these backdoors open.


Diebold spokesman David Bear admitted to the New York Times that the back door was inserted intentionally so that election officials would be able to update their systems easily. Bear justified Diebold's actions by saying, "For there to be a problem here, you're basically assuming a premise where you have some evil and nefarious election officials who would sneak in and introduce a piece of software... I don't believe these evil elections people exist."


All it takes is one David, all it takes is one...


On July 13, Robert F Kennedy Jr filed a "Qui Tam" suit against Diebold based on information provided by Whistle-blowers within the company - who I suspect might be a bit more forthcoming than Mr. Bear about the true reason for those "back-doors" and just where some of those "evil elections people" might be found.


Kennedy's suit is expected to be held under judicial seal for 60 days while the Department of Justice determines whether they will join the suit. This should be a no-brainer since the interpreted code used by Diebold and discovered by Ion Sancho is already in violation of HAVA (the Help America Vote Act) and according to Bradblog...


Section 1, paragraph 4.2.2 of the FEC Voting System Standards of 2002 which specifically bans certification for machines which contain the type of "interpreted code" which Diebold has now been forced to admit is present in all of their electronic voting machines.


Whether the Alberto Gonzales Justice Dept will do their duty and join with the suit, or simply use the delay as a method to ensure that Diebold and other easily hackable voting systems remain in place until it's too late to implement replacements before the November 06 elections - remains to be seen.


Vyan

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Abu Gonzales"! - perfect!
I had been calling him Consiglieri Alberto, but yours is snappier!

Your post is a good summary of some of the progress that's been made bringing the issue forward, out of the so-called "lunatic fringe" world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I love it too!! Recommended this thread I did I did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. a 60 day hold??!!
That stinks. That just eats up time pre-election. I'm sick of the way they use these kinds of maneuvers to subvert the will of the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. The fragile support for voting machines
vanishes when: the officials who do not realize the dangers become aware- even if they have benefited from them

become aware that insiders higher up the food chain or perhaps some clever rival can rob THEM at will and make them beholden anyway for their careers

realize that the people also know

realize that democracy's invisible demise is their own.

The strength of this cheating franchise is also a weakness, that the invisible hands are not local hands, not a matter of just anyone or else it would be chaos. Therefore few lawmakers are cognizant of how dishonest and dangerous the machines are. A conspiracy of machines is too large or too narrow because of their great power to simply write elections. Everyone has to be a dull, cringing sycophant or complete fraud, or they must be forever blindly ignorant.

It is in hastening the day of awakening before they DO become lost sycophants cringing before invisible vote switchers that the activists have scored their greatest victory. The power of the machines and the bullying sales pitch and Ney HAVA onslaught is indicative a an equal and more reactive weakness- so long as people take action. What did they think? That a chosen GOP elite could manage vote tabulations and lord it over everyone, an open invisible tyranny? That ANY person could hand on such extreme power easily to a new inner circle member? It's very existence is an insulting slapdown to their own ranks most of all, reducing them all to Daley's Chicago graveyard of dead voters.

In the necessary expression of voting reform it is always good to remember the exact shape of this beast. A few radical companies with favored access to electoral domination and insider knowledge of cheating backdoors available to a special circle. It HAS to be small but it has to be TOO MANY people and many of whom don't have a technical clue to what what they are so easily plugging into.

So that is why there is such dense complexity, such careful rigging and such a forest of other fraud and suppression. That is why they would move on from one old scam to another before the jig is up, but I think the move to Internet voting and the principle of malleable invisibility has been dealt a timely blow.

Yet in many states and countries the march of invisible techno-fraud goes on. And the world suffers while democracy battles for life.

The things that happened or did not happen that may have been decisive are all reduced to this grinding struggle in which both sides are making gains. Had the Congress been killed in a terror attack on 9/11. Had other things given Bush more support. Had they not the need to cheat so much just to survive. We are on the edge and clawing back to justice. At the very least, fraud will not prevail. They can only reduce themselves more and more to beasts, then cornered beasts, then to the ranks of history's dishonored discards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. Plan for November: Absentee Ballot voting. Boycott the machines!
Apparently, I'm the only one who HAS a plan. So hear me out. There is NO CHANCE of an accurate, verifiable vote this November. Although the election reform movement is off and running, there just isn't time. This highly, corrupt, new, Bushite-controlled, riggable electronic voting system got entrenched too quickly (during the 2002-2004 period), abetted by the $4 billion "Help America Vote Act" boondoggle. Major efforts--like RFK Jr.'s lawsuit against the electronic voting companies--don't have the time to bring about reform by November. (And Alberto "torture memo" Gonzales will of course delay it as long as possible.) (And who knows if it will survive a Bushite court system anyway?)

So-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o--what do we do? Some will be closely monitoring the vote counts, challenging suspicious results, filing lawsuits, and continuing to educate the public, etc. And others are calling for mass protests over the (inevitably) stolen elections. Yeah, well, that leaves a lot of people out. Most cannot participate in mass protests; most have seen how little mass protests can do against fascist authorities who don't give a crap what we think; and monitoring election results is all fine and good--and vitally necessary--but if the war profiteering corporate news monopolies are in collusion with the fascists and don't report it--as we know they are--noe of these actions is not going to bring about reform--at least not any time soon.

But what if everybody in the country who despises Bush REFUSES TO VOTE ON THEIR RIGGED VOTING MACHINES? Say, 70%. (AB voting is up to 50% already in Los Angeles!). What if this is the new protest? What if we all boycott the machines?

AB voting is not safe--and WILL NOT RESULT IN AN ACCURATE VOTE COUNT. (Often they just scan AB votes into the rigged electronic system, thus separating the vote from the tangible evidence of the vote, as with optiscans.) BUT--Absentee Ballot voting is NON-COOPERATION. It says: "We will not vote on these machines." It reminds me a lot of the Montgomery bus boycott--triggered by Rosa Parks' REFUSAL TO COOPERATE with the segregated bus system. Then the whole community said, "We will not cooperate." They hit 'em in their MONEY.

Same with these EXPENSIVE new election theft machines. Make them obsolete. Make their purchasers look like the corrupt fools that they are. DON'T VOTE ON THEM!

We can't boycotting voting itself. That would be suicidal. But we CAN boycott the MACHINES! We can foster this rebellion, and create the climate for reform. Once it's established that the new election theft machines are going to gather dust--no one will vote on them!--then we go after the central election tabulators, and all the other corruptions of our election system.

Ordinary people have devised this protest themselves--individual voters trying to think how to outwit the rigged system and get their vote COUNTED. It is an indigenous protest against the rigged machines, that could get huge, with just a little help, and would be pivotal if it does.

It's easy. Everybody can do it. It is maximum participation protest. And it will HELP voter turnout. To those who say, "it's all rigged" and don't vote, we can say, "But this is a PROTEST aimed at UN-rigging the system!" No excuses then. If they refuse to vote AB as a protest against the rigged machines, they're just bad citizens anyway, and never would vote no matter what we say.

Also--and to me this is very important--it turns voting into an active outcry against rigged elections, instead of a somewhat gloomy, passive act, where you just hope against hope for the best. It will ACTIVATE consciousness. It will give people--all voters--a chance to SAY SOMETHING about things as they are--the lack of representation of majority views in Congress, the continual actions of the Bush junta against the interests of ordinary people, the lies, the thievery, the unjust war, and the rigged election that make these things possible, and that are preventing investigation and reform.

The WORST PROBLEM WE HAVE IS THE DEMORALIZATION of the American people! 70% against Bush. 84% against widened Mideast war. And we can't DO anything about it, and the corporate news monopolies keep telling people that they are isolated and alone, in their progressive views, and that the "mainstream" is now rightwing, fundamentalist 'christian' and pro-war. It's insane. It's nonsense. But it gets to people. An Absentee Ballot voting REBELLION would help MORALE!

To those who object to this protest idea (with irrelevant points about the insecurity of AB voting), I would ask: You got any better ideas for November?

I keep asking that. And no one does.*

With just a bit of leadership--a few press releases, some focus--we have the chance to involve nearly every anti-Bush voter in America in a protest against this rigged system on Nov. 7.

Bumpersticker: "Bust the Machines--Vote Absentee!"

----------

*(Why are some people opposing this? Frankly, I think it's the Corporate Democrats/Common Cause crowd, trying to save electronic voting and corporate control of the election system. They're pushing optiscans--but optiscans are ALSO run on TRADE SECRET, PROPRIETARY programming code, as are the central tabulators. The optiscan ballots--tangible evidence of the vote--go into a box and are almost never seen again. Audits are rare; recounts are even rarer. Optiscans are better than touchscreens, because you have the POSSIBILITY of a recount. But the REAL problem is CORPORATE control, and that cannot be broken except by throwing every one of these goddamned election theft machines into 'Boston Harbor.' An Absentee Ballot protest--a BOYCOTT of ALL electronic voting machines--can, theoretically, accomplish that, by expressing the REBELLION of the American people, and creating the climate for reform.)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You are right. And I'm with you...
I'll bring several family members along with me. Plus I will tell my Dem county auditor why we're all doing it, and let her know that we'll all make it a point to vote against her in the next election if she doesn't change her tune on Diebold (she's a clueless, gushing Diebold fan).

I haven't seen any better ideas. I'll spread the word and ask others to do the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. "...while the Dept. of Justice determines whether or not they will
join the suit..."

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

ONLY IT'S NOT FUNNY! It's pathetic!

There is NO JUSTICE in that Department, nor do they care one bit if our elections are fair, transparent and DEMOCRATIC!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. Great summary - yes, it remains to be seen
whether the DOJ civil rights division still functions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC