Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Funniest excuse for why Stem Cell research is bad: People will live longe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 05:52 AM
Original message
Funniest excuse for why Stem Cell research is bad: People will live longe
http://www.newsjournal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060726/OPINION10/607260342/1111/OPINION

Prolonging life of elderly will burden younger people

Through the years I have opposed most of this administration's policies. However, I find myself in agreement with President Bush's veto of the stem cell bill. Bush opposes embryonic stem cell research on moral grounds, knowing the potential benefits that research offers for those with life-threatening illnesses. My agreement is not based on Bush's belief that embryos should be considered life, but whether such research leading to prolonging life can be morally justified to the detriment of our children and grandchildren.

Embryonic stem cell research could be a panacea for the 76 million baby boomers who'll begin retiring in less than four years. This group will put a strain on those who'll support us in our later years. It's estimated there will be less than two workers per retiree when the last of the boomers leave the work force.

Breakthroughs in medical science have allowed humans to enjoy longer lives. If it weren't for the expertise of my doctors and nurses and advanced cardiac procedures, I'd be dead five years now. Boomers can be expected to live well into our 80s and 90s. The question is do we want to live forever at the expense of our descendants?

Without federal funding, stem cell research will continue, although at an abbreviated pace. If research comes to fruition, it might be wise to increase the minimum retirement age to 65, and gradually increase normal retirement to 70 or 75.

XXXX XXXXXX, Wilmington
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh my GAWD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. Draft senior citizens!
See, any problem is solvable if just think about it. (Yeah, sarcasm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Like Swift solution to the Irish problem
Always fun to read
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. Funny the writer blames the "expertise of doctors, nurses and advanced
cardiac procedures" and not his own willingness to accept the benefits of them. Especially in view of his thesis about people living too long. Maybe his irony muscle has degenerated. Or else, morelikely, he's thinking of those OTHER people, not him. He's special.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. And . . . allowing people to live longer means that the potential senior
citizens will unreasonably be holding on to jobs that should go to young men and women who REALLY need those positions. Yes, stem cell treatment in the future will ruin our economy by preventing natural attrition . . .

These people make me want to puke!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rusty charly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. tell me this is from "the onion"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 06:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. No, this administration loves dead people
I've heard this sentiment from neocons before. Poor Old people are a burden. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. It's from the Wilmington News Journal here in delaware
most of the letters today were for supporting stem cell. I swear they find the boneheaded ones in there just to proove our side is logical thinking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. With this logic, all research on Alzheimers and cancer should cease too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamahaingttta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. This is the crux of the buiscuit...
Edited on Wed Jul-26-06 06:58 AM by iamahaingttta
This is the apostrophe. This is what it's REALLY all about.

I don't believe for one second that George W Bush gives a shit about frozen embryos. I don't believe for a nanosecond that he cares about murder and whether or not a cluster of cells lives or dies. He's responsible for the deaths of countless children in Iraq and it doesn't appear to weigh on his conscience. I do believe that he was selected by the Neo-Con scumbags to be the face and the patsy while they carry out their agenda of global domination.

Part of that agenda appears to be to kill off as many people on the planet as possible. Without getting called on it. All of their actions point to this. Capitalism knows that there are too many people on the planet and a finite amount of resources, and Capitalism knows that EITHER the rich are gonna have to give up some of their stuff and share, or the rich are gonna have to get rid of many "useless eaters." Guess which choice Capitalism is going with! George W Bush as the representative of the Neo-Con Capitalists has personified that choice.

The rest of us would rather fix this overpopulation problem with education, birth control and better choices and opportunities for people. Not these Neo-Cons. There's not much money to be made doing all that. And it means they would have to share. They want as many of us dead as possible so they can have it all for themselves. If the average person lived longer, that would spoil their plans for domination. You can be certain that once they've carried out their agenda of eliminating as many "useless eaters" as possible, that they will jump on the stem cell bandwagon for themselves. And they'll want to live forever because they are all narcissists, every single one of them!

(and the fundie base for whom he signed the veto are just sick and twisted fucks who are totally brain-dead and contradictory in everything that they do. but they pay the bills...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. For those using that argument
Hmm, maybe we could reduce the number of people on the disability dole, hmm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC