Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Harpers)Source: Bush Administration Considers Troop Deployment in Lebanon

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 01:52 PM
Original message
(Harpers)Source: Bush Administration Considers Troop Deployment in Lebanon

http://harpers.org/sb-source-bush-admin-lebanon-1153936109.html

Source: Bush Administration Considers Troop Deployment in Lebanon
Posted on Wednesday, July 26, 2006. By Ken Silverstein.

SourcesThere's much discussion of putting a multinational, NATO-led force in southern Lebanon as part of a ceasefire agreement in the Israel–Lebanon conflict, but Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, according to a story in the Washington Post, has said that she does “not think that it is anticipated that U.S. ground forces . . . are expected for that force.” However, a well-connected former CIA officer has told me that the Bush Administration is in fact considering exactly such a deployment.

The officer, who had broad experience in the Middle East while at the CIA, noted that NATO and European countries, including England, have made clear that they are either unwilling or extremely reluctant to participate in an international force. Given other nations' lack of commitment, any “robust” force—between 10,000 and 30,000 troops, according to estimates being discussed in the media—would by definition require major U.S. participation. According to the former official, Israel and the United States are currently discussing a large American role in exactly such a “multinational” deployment, and some top administration officials, along with senior civilians at the Pentagon, are receptive to the idea.

The uniformed military, however, is ardently opposed to sending American soldiers to the region, according to my source. “They are saying 'What the fuck?'” he told me. “Most of our combat-ready divisions are in Iraq or Afghanistan, or on their way, or coming back. The generals don't like it because we're already way overstretched.”

Sending American soldiers is at this point simply an option and by is no means a certainty, but if the administration decides to move forward, my source said, “It would be viewed in the Arab world as the United States picking up a combat role on behalf of Israel.” And as Mahan Abedin, Director of Research at the Centre for the Study Of Terrorism in London, noted in an email he sent me yesterday, any deployment of peacekeepers to southern Lebanon “would require the acquiescence of Hezbollah. There are no indications this will be forthcoming, not least because such a force could potentially lay the groundwork for Hezbollah's disarmament.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. NoWAY! Out of Iraq into Lebanon !
Out of the frying pan and into the fire?

Hell no! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. there's no way
that's a recipe for WW3.

now that i think about it, that's probably the plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DAMMIT DAMMIT DAMMIT!!!!!!!

NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Insanity reigns! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. NEWT et. al. get their wish?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Let Newt and Rush shag their fat asses to Lebanon.
Don't send our beloved USA troops to go fight their bloated Neo-Conservative war. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blonndee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Would be an absolute disaster.
"Overstretched" is a gross understatement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. Wonder what the troops will have to say about this plan?
"Let the mutiny begin..."
I hope this will be the move that
motivates the military to tell the neocons to go fuck themselves.
I can dream, can't I?


BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blonndee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I know of one and what he might say.
Same thing he says about Iraq. Don't know what he would DO, though. I imagine he would follow orders if compelled to do so. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. Bad, bad idea. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. This Is A Very Bad Idea, Sir
U.S. troops in such a force would be a magnet for attack by Hezbollah, and other jihadi organizations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Which is only a bad idea to *sane* people.
Anti-sane people might think this is a perfect way to incite "a(nother) new Pearl Harbor."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. This is because we want to
be targets for them over there so we don't have to be targets for them over here.

And it worked so well in the past when we had marines in Lebanon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Better for Us to Die over There than Die here at Home! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
12. Stupidest idea ever
Whoever would consider this can't even be told to pull their head out because you couldn't even have a head to think of something so stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
15. This is waving a red flag in front of a bull
There is no way this is anything but an incitement of escalating violence. Anybody who advocates this does not want Hezbollah to disarm. The loss of life will be breathtaking. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
16. Bush is just following the game plan outlined in Revelations
It all makes sense if you assume he is, or believes himself to be, the Antichrist (or more likely someone behind him feels the same way).

Why, you're the sort of person who would have protested when the Dinosaurs went extinct! The world has to blow up some time... there's no more new lands to discover. Time to find new ways of making money by sowing chaos and discord.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC