Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What we really lost in the latest marriage decisions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-27-06 09:57 AM
Original message
What we really lost in the latest marriage decisions
New York and Washington's supreme courts are among the most liberal in the nation. New York's especially is both well regarded and can be relied upon to expand individual rights. If there ever were a state that one would assume would be likely to extend the 14 Amendment, or its New York equivalent, to gays and lesbians, New York would be it. Yet they did the exact opposite.

First, some backround. If a state wants to discriminate on the basis of race it must meet strict scrutiny. Under strict scrutiny a law must meet a legitimate state purpose and be narrowly tailored to advance that purpose. Such laws are assumed to be unconstitutional unless proven otherwise. It is a very high standard and thus we have very few laws which permit racial discrimination by governmental bodies.

If a state wishes to discriminate on the basis of gender it must meet an intermediate level of scrutiny. A state must still justify permitting gender discrimination but the scrutiny isn't quite as high. Thus a state can provide coverage for viagra but not birth control.

Finally for most other classes there is the rational basis test. For this test a state just needs to have a reason for the discrimination. This test is exceptionally easy to pass. Courts don't look at the veracity of the reason thus a reason can be a sham. They can use conflicting reasoning and don't even have to show that the law is at all tailored toward the promotion of that goal.

Many of us had hoped to see discrimination against gays and lesbians treated by courts as at least as problematic as gender discrimination. We would have loved to see the strict scrutiny standard. Instead, one of the most liberal courts in the US has decided upon the rational basis standard. If liberal courts have decided on this standard then we have little hope of the current federal judiciary apply more rigourous standards. We lost a great deal with these decisions. We almost surely are going to have to win the ENDA battle in the Congress now. This wasn't just marriage it was much larger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-27-06 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC