Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Noo-kyoo-lurr...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 12:10 PM
Original message
Noo-kyoo-lurr...
Edited on Fri Jul-28-06 01:03 PM by WilliamPitt
(watching George and Tony reminded me of this)

===

OK, I'm freaking out.

It's a quiet freak-out, even a mellow one by comparison to ones I've witnessed first-hand and endured personally, but it is happening. I seize up like a poorly-oiled engine several times a day, and my teeth grate together so hard that it sounds like two icebergs colliding in the North Atlantic inside my head. It won't be long now before my body's ability to manufacture endorphins shorts out like an old fuse, and when that happens, I will probably collapse into a gibbering gob of pudding.

Blame it on the movies I watch.

You see, I like watching movies. Good ones, bad ones, scary ones, stupid ones, action and adventure and gore and mayhem and mystery, I don't care, but the DVD is in the player so I can unplug my brain for a while every day. My movie collection is on the verge of outgrowing the large shelf I bought to contain it. Yes, I buy movies instead of renting them. I'm that guy who can never return rented movies on time; I wind up paying $276.33 in rental fees to Blockbuster for a movie I could have bought for $14.99.

Over the last few days, a strange theme has developed in my movie-watching. My ears perk up every time I hear a certain word. I heard it while watching "Deep Impact" the other day, again during "Seven," and again during "Thirteen Days." I hear the word, and that's when the freak-out kicks in. I can't control it, and all too often it sneaks up on me.

Before we get into the word, I should explain what I am not freaking out about.

I am not freaking out about the Valerie Plame investigation. I should be, but I'm not. Hell, it's not like this is a big deal or anything. Valerie Plame was only running a CIA intelligence network dedicated to tracking the nuclear ambitions of Iran, and her exposure only annihilated a good portion of our ability to keep an eye on that situation. It's not like wrecking her career and exposing her position was a blow to national security or anything.

I am not freaking out about the fact that the Abramoff scandal is widening into a pestiferous vat of bribery and prostitution. I should be, but I'm not. They have taken to calling this thing "Hookergate," and a lot of people are smelling blood on the wind. Former Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham is currently enveloped by an eight-year prison sentence, and the scandal surrounding him looks to snare several other House members. It appears that a defense contractor was providing bribes and prostitutes to as many as fifteen Representatives so as to curry favor, including the Duke's favor.

Ed Rollins, one of the GOP's heaviest strategists, was chewing the fat with George Stephanopoulos on the Charlie Rose show Tuesday night, and had this to say: "If this House scandal is as big as I think it is from talking to people that are around it - of course it started with Cunningham and it's moving beyond that. Duke Cunningham, a congressman from San Diego who took bribes. There was a real little cabal on the Defense Appropriations Committee in which a couple of people who basically made an awful lot of money off of defense contractors and basically rewarded a bunch of members, Republicans."

If this thing widens in the way it seems to be, if the bribery allegations spread to House members swapping whores in the back of defense contactor limousines, well  Ms. Lewinski will suddenly seem a piker by comparison, and the geometry surrounding the '06 midterms will be tossed into a cocked hat (pun definitely intended). Nope, not freaking out.

Nor am I freaking out about a story from the Providence Journal about American soldiers going hungry in Iraq. I should be, but I'm not. After all, we are simply seeing the unfolding of Donald Rumsfeld's master plan: go to war on false pretenses by scaring the fudge out of the American people, lie with your bare face hanging out, and then send in too few troops with no armor and a bad tactical plan to guarantee utter failure and complete disgrace.

American troops are now going door-to-door in Iraq begging the civilians for food, and writing home to their families asking them to send canned provisions. One troop wrote his mom that he and his squad dropped ten pounds in the first couple of weeks they were over there, and only get fed meager provisions twice a day while working 22-hour patrol shifts under combat conditions. Rumsfeld must think that hungry troops will fight harder. I am more convinced than ever that he is a Sith Lord.

There are so many things I am not freaking out about, but should be. We get a Kewpie Doll talking-head natterbrain named Tony Snow as press secretary for the administration, on the heels of a hint from chief of staff Josh Bolten that the live, televised press conferences out of the White House may go the way of the dodo. Who cares? The same cocktail-pinkie clubhouse "journalists" in DC who ignored the historic hand grenades lobbed by Stephen Colbert, because he skewered them beneath the fifth rib, aren't likely to care much about limited access to administration spin. They've written it so much in the last few years that they know it by rote.

Yeah, I'm only freaking out about one thing, one word. Perhaps I am freaking out in such a limited fashion, about such a narrow issue, because whatever portion of my brain that handles freak-outs over larger and more important issues has been reduced to gelatinous goo thanks to everything that has happened since these crazy fools got their hands on the main levers.

Whatever the reasons, I am losing my mind over one word: nuclear.

It popped up in those movies I've watched over the last few days. "Deep Impact" had astronauts planting "nuclear" devices on a comet; "Seven" had Morgan Freeman mentioning books about "nuclear" weapons in a passing conversation; and "Thirteen Days" had the Kennedy administration scrambling over "nuclear" missiles in Cuba.

Nuclear, nuclear, nuclear. The word has been around for decades, and for the longest time, was at the center of American foreign policy and the deepest fears of the American people. Nuclear brinkmanship. Nuclear winter. Nuclear holocaust. Etc. It's a great, big, fat, important, and serious word. Its very existence has changed the face of the planet. In the last few weeks, the word has been bandied about regarding Iran. Do they have nuclear weapons? Will the Bush administration use our nuclear weapons to get rid of their nuclear weapons? How will this affect Pakistan and its nuclear weapons?

The word has been getting around lately, and has been on the lips of Mr. Bush and his cronies, along with a whole galaxy of television talking heads. You hear it all the time.

Sort of.

Too often - and this is the nut of my freak-out - what you hear is "nukular." Phonetically, that version of the word spreads out to "noo-kyoo-luhr." I've heard a dozen people on supposedly-smart news shows blither that version of the word. It started with Bush, who could not pronounce "nuclear" properly if you promised him all the oil in the universe, and has spread like a dumb disease across the landscape. The people in the movies I've watched get it right, ya know, those Hollywood types, but neither the President of the United States nor most of his closest people nor the cream of the nabob crop on television can get this word past their teeth without sounding like hapless waterheads.

So here's the thing. If we as a nation are going to be led by dangerous fools, if we are going to allow treason to stand in the highest ranks of government, if we are going to allow our Representatives to get wild with prostitutes and fat wads of cash, if we are going to allow our soldiers to slowly starve in Iraq while getting blasted out of unarmored Humvees during an ill-conceived occupation, the very least we can do is not sound stupid while doing it.

The word is "nuclear." Noo-klee-urr. Work with me here. I'm freaking out.

From here: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/050506Z.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. as in KLEEnex,right?
I have listened to GW so long, I'm not sure how to pronounce it myself. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Mr. Pitt, I salute you and
agree wholeheartedly.
Now I'm going to go look up that story from the Providence Journal about American soldiers going hungry in Iraq. How did I miss that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. Link for that story here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Thanks, Sydnie. I googled to no avail, so I appreciate that.
I wonder if the American stories have been scrubbed?

The link you provided originates in/is information from occupied iraq (not that I care, but it's sad that we have to go to occupied Iraq for info).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Here's a link to the Providence Journal article too
Edited on Fri Jul-28-06 01:29 PM by Sydnie
http://www.projo.com/news/bobkerr/projo_20060426_wedco26.a4cf005.html

I found that when it was first discussed and had it linked in the thread I linked you to before.

I am still disgusted by this story.

edited to add - I just sent the reporter an email asking him to do a follow up story on the mother and her efforts. Let's see what becomes of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. And you just reminded me of this:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I just got a read reciept from the email that I sent him
Let's hope he does a follow up on that other story now.

They would have to take my son from my cold, dead body for them to get him. :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapislzi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. You might want to try decaf...
All kidding aside...I feel your pain.

Well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. BushCo is arming non-signatories of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhiannon55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hearing * say "nu-cu-lar" is like hearing fingernails on a chalkboard
It sets my teeth on edge. Hearing other, presumably smarter, people pronounce nuclear like that makes me want to barf. Anyone one who reads (which leaves out the chimp-in-chief) HAS to know better! Gaaa!

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. go chill down south for a bit
I hear a certain someone bought a piece of land near a certain someone and a whole bunch of nobody's plan to go down there and do nothing in particular except maybe, just maybe, bring some attention to the biggest CLUSTERFUCK in American history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. Reminds me of a story about the Castilian dialect of Spanish.
It turns out there was a princess of Castile who lisped. So that she wouldn't be embarrassed by sounding different, her father the king ordered all his subjects to lisp and so Castellano was born. This is probably just a tale but it seems that those who don't want to embarrass our king have decided to adopt all his grammar and pronunciation boo boos too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. I've noticed the same thing..
I get heart palpitations every time I've heard that word out of *'s mouth. Now, I, too, am hearing it more and more on msn, and it grates the hell out of me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. Those who say noo-ku-lar
should go the the liberry and look up the proper pronounciation.

Or they will all look like idjits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. Wish someone would ask * to define "nuclear"
Hell I'd even be happy if he defined "nucular". Actually that might be as good as his definition of "sovereign".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlwaysQuestion Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. Another great read
William Pitt, even though the subject matter is bleak, you always give us a good read. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. Will...
"the impending indictment of Karl Rove"

Help me out here - I really don't want to hijack the thread, but I had put that to bed in my mind.
Can you elaborate without starting a flame fest?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Old essay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sammy Pepys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
14. So many "what ifs" in that old post...n/t
....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snivi Yllom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
15. Karl Rove's indictment is imminent?
I thought Rove was indicted.

Or he would be indicted.

Or it was sealed.

I am having trouble keeping your story straight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Old essay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. You need to breathe deep breaths...take a few of these...
Edited on Fri Jul-28-06 12:56 PM by jus_the_facts
....with a nice cool beverage of your choice....and call me in the morning...sincerely...Amber, MD.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
21. Eisenhower pronounced it 'nucular'.
And Jimmy Carter (who is a nuclear engineer). And Bill Clinton, on occasion. It didn't 'start with Bush'. See: http://www.bartelby.net/64/C007/0140.html and http://www.bartelby.net/68/56/4156.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
22. This reminds me of Marc Antony's eulogy of Julius Ceasar
Edited on Fri Jul-28-06 01:19 PM by Generic Other
The rhetorical structure is set up like a moustrap. Snap. And it makes you sound like the brinksmanship has brought you to the brink. You convey your emotional state and the surreal absurdity of our situation nicely.

Having lived so much of my life under the threat of nuclear annihilation, I had drawn comfort in the fact that the threat had eased up a bit after the fall of the Soviet Union, but that was before Bush re-ignited the danger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tactical Progressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
26. 'Nucular' doesn't much bother me
Yeah, it's wrong, but it's not that uncommon a mispronounciation. I think it's common enough that it should maybe be an alternative pronounciation in the dictionary.

My high school physics teacher - teacher mind you - always pronounced it nucular. I knew it was wrong, but he did such a good job teaching that I ended up majoring in physics in college. And if I remember correctly Jimmy Carter, a nuclear engineer on submarines, also pronounced it incorrectly. It's not just some uneducated, redneck pronounciation; it's a fairly widespread locution. It's not a big deal either way.

So while I disagree with the main point of your piece, it was still a great read. All the rest of the stuff about this administration's behavior that you asided was really nicely constructed. The treasonous Valerie Plame incident I especially liked. You have a way of formulating short paragraphs that get to the essence of the insanity we're dealing with that I've come to increasingly appreciate, or maybe you're just getting better at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC