Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MORE Iraqi Lies: Huge Reconstruction Costs Concealed From Congress

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 03:59 PM
Original message
MORE Iraqi Lies: Huge Reconstruction Costs Concealed From Congress
More Iraq War Lies: Auditors Reveal Huge Reconstruction Cost Overruns Concealed from Congress

In a classic “take out the trash” maneuver, a federal audit released late Friday reveals, as Jamie Glanz of the New York Times reports,http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/30/world/middleeast/30reconstruct.html?hp&ex=1154232000&en=8b11e105dbfa0141&ei=5094&partner=homepage


“The State Department agency in charge of $1.4 billion in reconstruction money in Iraq used an accounting shell game to hide ballooning cost overruns on its projects there and knowingly withheld information on schedule delays from Congress.


...............

Indeed, to say these findings were released at all is an overstatement, as they were buried in an audit of the Basra hospital project touted by Laura Bush and Condi Rice. The audit—which was conducted by the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction, an independent office that reports to Congress and the Pentagon—found that the cost of hospital project, which was contracted out to San Francisco-based multinational Bechtel for $50 million, could, as the Times reports, “rise as high as $169.5 million, even after accounting for at least $30 million pledged for medical equipment by a charitable organization.” The United States Agency for International Development, or AID, intentionally hid these cost overruns (as well as those for other projects) from Congress, by reclassifying them as overhead, or “indirect costs.” An AID contracting officer cited in the audit notes that the agency “did not report these costs so it could stay within the $50 million authorization.”

http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Totallybushed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Has there ever been a more
corrupt, incompetent, and/or misguided administration in the history of mankind??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Pentagon IG left in 2004
"WASHINGTON - The chief Pentagon agency in charge of investigating and reporting fraud and waste in Defense Department spending in Iraq quietly pulled out of the war zone a year ago - leaving what experts say are gaps in the oversight of how more than $140 billion is being spent...

"..The auditors were withdrawn in the fall of 2004 because other agencies were watching spending, too. But experts say those other agencies don't have the expertise, access and broad mandate that the inspector general has - and don't make their reports public.

That means that the bulk of money being spent in Iraq doesn't get public scrutiny, leaving the door open for possible waste, fraud and abuse, experts say..."

http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/12927316.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. More Halliburton looting on behalf of Dick Cheney....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Just the tip of a multi-hundred billion dollar iceberg: follow the money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is a distant third, after the costs of the war in American and Iraqi
Edited on Sat Jul-29-06 04:32 PM by pinto
lives, but the rape of the American taxpayer - pulled off by the very civil servants entrusted with "oversight" and their subcontractors -is beyond the pale. And they did it "in full sight" oftentimes. That's what infuriates me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. They are not rebuilding anything that is not useful for the U.S. military
It is all a lie. They don't give a fuck about the Iraqi people - widespread use of depleted uranium alone proves that point.

Dick Cheney and his buddies are "using" our tax dollars so they can steal all the oil in the ME, while depopulating the region.

If they are not stopped soon, we will all live to regret what has happened in our name.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC