Do you think if Lamont wins, the other primary challenges might do better?

[Greeby]

Hong Tran vs Maria Cantwell : Tran being the only remaining challenger who has no intention of being bought off like Mark Wilson was
http://www.hongtran.com/

Jonathan Tasini vs Hillary Clinton : Realpolitik tells me to forget about it, but Jonathan could still get enough to embarass her
http://www.tasinifornewyork.org/

Jennifer Lawless vs James Langevin (Rhode Island)
http://www.lawlessforcongress.com/

Phil Dunkelbarger vs Stephen Lynch: Lynch being the Shrub-supporting odd-man-out from the MA Congressional Delegation
http://www.dunkelbargerdemocrat.org/

That's all for now, if anyone knows of any similar House races, don't hesitate to add them.

And remember, The Green Papers is your friend :)
http://www.thegreenpapers.com

[november3rd]

1. Tasini

Tasini deserves all the help he gets, and more. Nobody has more guts, stronger principles, and better grasp of the issues.

Jonathan Tasini: He can handle the truth.

[babylonsister]

2. The primary between Lamont and Lieberman is being

characterized as a referendum on whether we should be at war in Iraq or not.

Gawd, please, let Lamont WIN!

[LA lady]

3. Interesting thought

I just read an article that said the Israeli/Lebanon situation is going to help Lieberman. It said the Jewish vote which might have gone for Lamont, was reverting back to Lieberman because they were afraid Israel was losing support in the US.
It really gave me pause when I read it cause it made a lot of sense.

[babylonsister]

4. Well, this might put a kink in that thinking:

I haven't read the thread, but remembered the title, so don't know how I feel about Lamont's decision yet.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=2747530