Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Army raises maximum age for enlistment (up 5 years to 39)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 06:15 PM
Original message
U.S. Army raises maximum age for enlistment (up 5 years to 39)

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N18239519.htm

U.S. Army raises maximum age for enlistment

WASHINGTON, Jan 18 (Reuters) - The U.S. Army, which missed its fiscal 2005 recruiting goal, said on Wednesday it has raised the maximum enlistment age for new soldiers by five years to 39, greatly expanding its pool of potential recruits.

Army officials said the move did not reflect desperation to reverse recruiting shortfalls, noting the Army had achieved seven straight monthly recruiting goals despite coming up 7,000 short of last year's target of 80,000 recruits. The Army has blamed recruiting shortfalls in part on reluctance by some potential recruits to serve in the Iraq war.

Lt. Col. Bryan Hilferty, an Army spokesman, said older recruits must meet the same physical standards as the younger ones and attend the same basic training. The new age ceiling applies to recruits without prior military service.

"Experience has shown that older recruits who can meet the physical demands of military service generally make excellent soldiers based on their maturity, motivation, loyalty and patriotism," Army Recruiting Command said in a statement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Now Free Republic will stampede enlistment centers all over the country.
,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. It will look like the running of the bulls in Spain
All those brave RW SWAT teams looking for the big signing bonuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. "The Army has blamed recruiting shortfalls in part on reluctance by some
Edited on Wed Jan-18-06 06:38 PM by Mayberry Machiavelli
potential recruits to serve in the Iraq war."

Gee, ya think? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kineneb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. now if my Little Brother whines
I really can go tell him to enlist...and he used to be able to speak Farsi...bet they could use him...

(actually, I wouldn't want him to fight for BushCo, but he voted for them, so...tough, I get to gig him)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
against all enemies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wrong, looks like 42 year olds can now join the fun - for some big $$$
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. The New Face of the New Army of One
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Just offshore some more jobs and pretend to want to restore ethics.
That'll make people eagar to fight what's right. Or at least to die comparatively quickly because there's nothing else left for them now that they're jobs have vanished and nothing substantial to replace it with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. So, should we expect congestive heart failure now
to replace IEDs as the leading cause of death among U.S. troops deployed to edges of the Empire?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. Oh great. They'll be emptying out the senior centers next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDebug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. How about raising to 93? n/t

Uncle Sam Wants You


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. I am UPSET that the Bush administration has not seen fit to appropriate
the necessary funds to give to all our troops kevlar pacemakers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. Somone please post this on free republic. I dont have the pain tolerance
to do it. Note give them the www.goarmy.com link and tell them to enlist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
13. Akkkk! I'm eligible again!
I USED to be protected (even from a draft) by being an air traffic controller (civilian). These days, I wouldn't bet on that protection...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. Excellent! Now Sean Hannity can sign up!
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC