Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bolton: Israeli deaths are different from Lebanese deaths

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 06:37 AM
Original message
Bolton: Israeli deaths are different from Lebanese deaths
The Washington note reporting that this sentence was in Bolton's statement at his Senate committee hearings, but was removed at the last minute.

http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/

At his Thursday Senate confirmation hearings, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee majority staff passed out Ambassador Bolton's "official statement". In that opening statement, there appeared a controversial and provocative sentence that asserted that Israelis and Lebanese who become innocent casualties in this war are not morally equivalent. His argument is that Israeli innoncents are more important than Lebanese innocent casualties because the Israelis were attacked by Hezbollah.

The sentence read:

But it is a mistake to ascribe a moral equivalence to civilians who die as the direct resulte of malicious terrorist acts, the very purpose of which are to kill civilians, and the tragic and unfortunate consequence of civilian deaths as a result of military action taken in self-defense.

Now, some have misunderstood what happened next. My surprise did not come when John Bolton read a script that was different than the one in hand. What happened was that just as John Bolton was beginning to read his statement, a new statement was distributed -- with only this line of text removed.

(end snip)

This was before the Qana murders. I also hope someone will ask him how he feels about this now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. God have mercy on these racist murdering thugs. Bolton is a disgusting ass
How in the world can the Senate confirm this scum?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. So much for the maxim of death being the Great Equalizer . . . hateful man
Edited on Mon Jul-31-06 06:45 AM by no_hypocrisy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. Did you notice the difficulty Bush had
saying the word 'killed' yesterday when he was 'regretting' the Qana slaughter? These criminals must be stopped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. What a piece of filth he is
Our children are precious, theirs are expendable. The monsters are in charge, here and in Israel. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. No doubt he will be approvedwithout dissent
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. at least not with enough dissent.
it's disapointing isn't it?

we can't even keep bolton -- the mutant tapeworm -- out of the u.n.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #7
34. I'm constantly thinking I'm understanding these pieces of info. that
are posted here at DU, but I cant say that I follow the Bush family support of Hitler during WWII, and now supporting the Israelis through warring with the Lebanese. One more twist-Kissing all the Oil barons in the Arab region. I guess it has noting to do with political ties, and more to do with a financial deal. You can learn so much about economics from the Bush family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
8. Do We Need To Keep Scorecards?
I expect a wingnut like Bolton to think Americans and Israelis are superior to A-rabs and Lebanese...but I see a lot of body counting and comparison in all arguments about what's going on. On both sides civilians are being targeted and killed. As long as Hezbollah missiles can fly down on Israeli towns, Israel is going to go after where it suspects those missiles have been launched from. Yes, Qana was a tragedy and war does such things. All deaths are wrong...especially in this kind of conflict that appears to be headed for yet another stalemate that will set the scene for the next round of violence.

Unfortunately Bolton stands in the way of a solution. There needs to be an honest broker who can ensure Israel does have real security on its Northern border and create dialogue with all parties to move to a possible round of negotiations in setting up at least an uneasy truce. Until the boosh regime is removed, don't expect the US to be able to be of any use...other than arms supplier and profiteer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itzamirakul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
36. I used to think that the removal of Bushco from the WH would mean
a return to normalcy, but no more. Not after the recent show that the Democrats put on in total support of Israel's actions in this crisis. Here we are, the party of the people, the fair-minded party,the reasoning, logical party, now taking a hard right stance in favor of one nation over another. Where was the voice of reason in opposition to the hard right? The leaders of our Democratic party have joined the hard right. There is not one iota of difference between the two.

What needs to be removed is the influence of the Lobby and of the hardline Israeli government from control of our government. I suspect that when Americans finally wake up and see that this is true, it will be too late to do anything about it. After all, it has taken them 6 years to wake up and start asking questions about 911. Questions that should have been asked on 912.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. Democrats Have Always Helped Ease ME Tensions
Look at Carter's work with Camp David or Clinton's on-going dialogue that brought a cold peace, but peace nonetheless, to the region and within eyeshot of a settlement. Sadly outside forces with more to profit from not only derailed those processes but now control the levers of power in this country. A balance, a conduit to true diplomacy has never existed to this regime and it's become a greater threat to Israel than an ally. Sadly it's gonna take time for the Israeli government...even the Likud...to realize this. Some, I think already are.

Blaming the Israeli lobby shortsells the many other interest groups who also have grown in status/power/money with increased tensions in the region. Someone earlier pointed out to me how much money our large corporations are sure to make in Lebanon restoring those blown up roads and cellphone towers and radio stations. Also the vast amounts of money American munitions makers are currently making as our weapons are still the "gold standard" of all sides in Iraq...not just the U.S.

This country needs serious lobbying reform and it must be something Democrats have to hold not only Repugnicans, but Democrats to as well. While there is a need for a special interest group to have a voice in an open society, it's another thing to buy influence and until this fine line is seriously addressed and real campaign finance reform and other changes come about, we'll be stuck in a country where war and the proliferation of it remains a main export of the U.S.

Peace...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itzamirakul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. Carter and Clinton's efforts - Yes. The recent Democratic stance-
No. That was then...this is now...

Definitely there are other groups of influence but none so powerful as the Israeli Lobby apparently is right now.

The Israeli Lobby is composed of other non-Israeli groups, and persons of influence. These are the representatives of the other special interest groups that you mention. Who knows what their reasons may be for being a part of what is called The Lobby? Undoubtedly, money and unbridled power.

We will never be able to rid ourselves of the Lobby just as Israel will never free itself from Hezbollah because even after they chase down the insurgents, disarm and kill them, remnants will still rise, take a new name and continue the fight. The same is true with the Lobby...even if it was possible to destroy it, power-seekers would arise from the ashes and start the quest for world dominance anew.

This is about so much more than the immediate conflict between Lebanon and Israel. And it does finally reach into the homes and lives of every American, no matter how comfortably they may be living today.

We can only hope that the Lobby will inflate itself to such a degree that it self-implodes. We can only hope that freedom fighters such as those seeking to gain fair and equal treatment for their own citizens will accomplish that aim and settle into the job of peacekeepers.

I don't know if you have read this paper or not, but I will provide the link. It describes the Israeli influence over our American government. Then I suggest that you google for papers that oppose the ideas expressed in the first paper. It may help you gain perspective and decide what you will or will not choose to believe.


www.londonreviewofbooks.com/v28/n06/mear01_.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. The DLC Stance...Not The Democratic Stance
I've been very aware of AIPAC influence since I got a copy of the former Illinois' Congressman's book in the late 70's. We're seeing how unabashed AIPAC love is a major reason Joe The Schmoe is about to go down and is sending a major chill up Hillary's spine.

I don't think there'd be the amount of AIPAC or other lobbyist influence on any Democratic administration as there is with this regime. I was critical (and still am) of how Clinton pandered to various lobbies (Telcom '96 for example), but when it came to diplomacy and a genuine interest in world peace, he put national interest ahead of party or self gain.

Israeli's influence relates deeply to the military/industrial complex that is a major cause of a lot of the lobbying and other problems. Its an open pit for our tax dollars in Iraq and through foreign aid to Israel and other countries. They make it coming and going...and yet here we're screaming about just one part of a bigger puzzle.

Peace...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
9. The Republicans keep shooting us. We are in the way of the barons
and must be taken out - with their lock-step destructive votes that don't represent us and their theft of our votes by their Republican made hardware, software, technicians, corporate networks, corporate owners, and crooked election officials.

Destroy the UN. Destroy our Constitution. Destroy our courts. Destroy our airports and seaports. Destroy our standing in the world. Eliminate anything standing in the way of the barons and corporations from doing whatever they want. No law, no oversight, no legal recourse, no unions, no dissent, no voice, no vote. But plenty of prisons and military.

Our country is a sham because of the stupidity of a Voinovich and a Lott. Their future wealth must be something to behold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
10. Was Reagan Correct?
In 1985, Ronald Reagan went to Bitburg Cemetery to lay a wreath. Asked why he would honor the remains of Nazi soldiers, including members of the Waffen SS, Reagan replied: "They were victims, just as surely as the victims in the concentration camps."

Based on what I'm reading on this site, many or most DU members agree with Reagan.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananarepublican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. They were victims of Nazi propaganda. If you dispute this then...
...you probably believe all members of the SS were born evil.

My understanding (I'm not 100% on this) is that a large number of those in the SS were part of Germany's elite fighting units, who were not involved in "Final Solution" related atrocities. (Let's not forget about those who nuked Hiroshima and Nagasaki. They are more directly associated with more deaths than any one Nazi death camp scum-bag murderer.)

The level of propaganda now being spewed forth today is very definitely a strong parallel to the efforts of Dr. Josef Goebbels throughout the 1930's.

Even though you don't agree, Reagan wasn't far off the mark. There is a fine line between seemingly good people doing despicable things.

P.S. The reality is that all soldiers are trained to kill. Jesus was not a fan of killing. Therefore, the term "Christian Soldier" gives me pause for thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Auschwitz Alone: More Than 1 Million Tortured To Death
Auschwitz alone was responsible for the deaths of more than 1 million, tortured to death - more tham four times the deaths in Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined.

All deaths are awful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Go defend Nazis on another website.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. He or She Does Have Point, Though
Edited on Mon Jul-31-06 07:54 AM by MannyGoldstein
Where does one draw the line on moral eqivalence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. I have been to Nazi concentration camps
Die Nazin töteten meine Familie! :grr:

I am in no mood for discussing 'moral eqivalence,' especially since I do not even believe "morality" actually exists.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananarepublican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #19
41. How does my post defend the Nazis?
It is highly offensive to even suggest it as such.

One of the points I was trying to make was that any nation can fall victim to propaganda and be led down the wrong path. The current drivel being put out by the MSM being a relevant case in point.

Another way of looking at my post is to consider the fact that over three million Vietnamese civilians were killed during the Vietnam War. This war was escalated by LBJ after faking an incident in the Gulf of Tonkin. So does this make everyone actively involved in this war of choice a war criminal? I for one, don't think so.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. So are you going to keep bugging me with Straw Man arguments?
At least you answered the last one yourself. :D



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. Please list all the DUers who like or agree with Reagan.
Maybe there are new members/trolls who do, but none of MY friends here like or agre with that woodenhead SOB.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. No, Those Who Sympathize With Dead Lebanese
Are OBVIOUSLY in league with the terrorists :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. Well, I've been called an anti-semite for stating I feel bad for the
slaughtered Lebanese children and civlians. That's beyond absurd.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Absurd and Dispicable! (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #10
29. Broken clock, etc.
In the same lines, rich people are also victims of capitalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #10
35. Absolutely contemptible
to imply a moral equivalence between SS dead and massacred children whose only crime was to live, briefly, a few miles north of a border.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #10
38. Bitburg was unfortunate
Frankly I don't dispute the notion that a lot of Wermacht and even SS soldiers were victims of the Nazi regime also; the problem with Bitberg was that some of the people buried there were actual death camp guards, and not Waffen SS soldiers. Even Reagan seems to have thought better of that since Deaver didn't really do much after planning that photo op.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bronxiteforever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
11. Bolton on why he did not serve in Vietnam "I did not want to die...
Edited on Mon Jul-31-06 07:07 AM by bronxiteforever
in a rice paddy" (quoted from Slate article in 2005) He supported that war and then joined the National Guard to avoid going over seas. My guess is the dead civilians didn't want to die either but of course they are worth less than his arrogant ass in his pompous mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
12. Someone needs to show Schumer and Cllinton this. I hear they
haven't decided on whether to support Bolton. If they do after this ignorant statement...

:grr: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. If ANYONE supports this POS after a statement like this, one would think
s/he needs her/his head examined.
What filth. What utter filth.
But then, he's a rePiglican, so what else can one expect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #13
25. Yes but at least his views should
guarantee a filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #12
28. Those two are the leading cheerleaders for Israel "defending itself"
I'm sure they want to support Bolton but are weighing the political expediency. They lost their moral compasses a long time ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #12
30. Pffft! There's no point.
It might be better to show it to Feingold and Dodd. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. IIRC, both those senators are virulently against Bolton's confirmation. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. Yes, and they would bring this to light effectively.
At least, IMO. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
14. And someday they will come up with a rationale explaining why Republican
Edited on Mon Jul-31-06 08:02 AM by The Backlash Cometh
deaths are different than Democratic deaths.

I've wondered about this for some time. If my good Republican friends are so adamant that 26 million Iraqis should die, men, women and children, then how much longer before they'll also justify another Kent State situation on their own home turf? We know what they did with Waco, but what would they do if the same thing happened to a Rainbow meeting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
16. As if I needed another reason to hate silly moustache man...
He's there for one reason: To do everything to subvert and damage the UN, to give these NeoCons their justification for disregarding it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
21. Anyone who votes to confirm Bolton should be held responsible for his
actions, and sent to the Hague as well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
27. So what do we do? Sit still while we're sold out by our
elected democratic reps? The same way they sold us out on the Roberts and Alito appointments to the Supreme Court? Because that is exactly what they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
32. Bolton has shined a laser point on everything that is....
wrong in this world. Some lives are viewed as more valuable than others. There is no humanity in that philosophy. The slaughter will continue as long as we allow ourselves to think that way.

:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC