If Bin laden's reported to be in, say, London, will we bomb there, too?

[elehhhhna]

How 'bout San Diego?

Thank GOD the MSM's reporting that that we sort of might have harmed a bad guy, maybe, in Pakistan.

Too bad about those children, though, huh?

[JuniperLea]

1. Careful, elehhhhna!

He's on your front porch!

Crying shame about the kids. Just think in terms of collateral and it will be ok.

He wants to bomb inside the US, I swear.

[Gato Moteado]

2. i heard bin laden is jim rob's roommate and he helps him.....

...administer the free republic website.

is this true?

[Ezlivin]

3. They weren't children: They were aiding and comforting the enemy

Therefore they are nothing but little foreign brown bomb targets.

I can't wait until the local police use this methodology. It'll be a slaughterhouse, but, hey, we'll all be safer.

Right?

[unblock]

4. their skin is brown. we like blowing up brown people.

as george carlin would say.

[elehhhhna]

5. we make exceptions for white skinned journalists

[Che_Nuevara]

6. What if we suspected that bin Laden was in the White House?

...

Just curious...

[elehhhhna]

8. In the words of the decrepit Rumfeld: "There are known unknowns

and unknown unknowns" so let's GO FOR IT lol

[Jim__]

7. Great question!

We justify bombing Pakistanis because there's a hance that we'll also kill a terroroist or two. But that rationale justifies bombing anywhere, anytime. Just like Bush's preemptive war doctrine.

[NNN0LHI]

9. I say he is in Saudi Arabia and we are never going to bomb there

I heard on CNN that Sharon was mumbling something as he was coming of his coma and it sounded like, "George, get Osama to make another tape." OK I made that up but I wouldn't be surprised at anything.

Don

[OneBlueSky]

10. actually, that's an excellent point . . . it demonstrates clearly that . .

BushCo considers "brown people" to be less that human and therefore expendable . . . this is a point that should be loudly raised by the Democrats . . . recommended . . .