http://www.wakeupwalmart.com/tour/facts/Snip-->
Wal-Mart's Chinese factory workers are treated poorlyWorkers making clothing for Wal-Mart in Shenzhen, China filed a class action lawsuit
against Wal-Mart in September 2005 claiming that they were not paid the legal minimum wage,
not permitted to take holidays off and were forced to work overtime.
]b]They said their employer had withheld the first three months of all workers' pay, almost
making them indentured servants because the company refused to pay the money if they quit.
New York Times, September 14, 2005
Workers making toys for Wal-Mart in China’s Guangdong Province reported that they would have
to meet a quota of painting 8,900 toy pieces in an eight hour shift in order to earn the
stated wage of $3.45 a day. If they failed to meet that quota, the factory would only pay
them $1.23 for a day’s work. China Labor Watch, December 21, 2005
Elsewhere workers producing goods for Wal-Mart also face appalling conditions,
despite Wal-Mart’s factory inspection program
Workers from Bangladesh, China, Indonesia, Nicaragua and Swaziland brought a class action lawsuit
against Wal-Mart in September 2005 asserting that the company’s codes of conduct were violated
in dozens of ways.
They said they were often paid less than the legal minimum wage and did not receive mandated
time-and-a-half for overtime, and some said they were beaten by managers and were locked in their factories.
New York Times, September 14, 2005 A female apparel worker in Dhaka, Bangladesh, said she was locked into the factory
and did not have a day off in her first six months. She said she was told if she
refused to work the required overtime, she would be fired.
Another worker said her supervisor attacked her “by slapping her face so hard that
her nose began bleeding simply because she was unable to meet” her “high quota.”
New York Times, September 14, 2005
In 2004, only 8 percent of Wal-Mart inspectors’ visits to factories were unannounced,
giving supervisors the chance to coach workers what to say and hide violations.
Wal-Mart claimed it planned to double unannounced visits by its inspectors but that
would still leave 80 percent of inspections announced.
CFO Magazine, August 2005
A former Wal-Mart executive James Lynn has sued the company claiming he was fired
because he warned the company that an inspection manager was intimidating underlings
into passing Central American suppliers.
Lynn documented forced pregnancy tests, 24-hour work shifts, extreme heat, pat-down searches,
locked exits, and other violations of the labor laws of these Central American countries.New York Times, July 1, 2005 and James Lynn to Odair Violim, April 28, 2002,
www.nclnet.org <--snip
Wal-Mart & Gender DiscriminationDownload the Wal-Mart and Gender Discrimination fact sheet - PDF
http://www.wakeupwalmart.com/downloads/wal-mart-gender-facts.pdfWal-Mart discriminates against women In 2001, six women sued Wal-Mart in California claiming the company discriminated against women
by systematically denying them promotions and paying them less than men.
The lawsuit, Dukes v. Wal-Mart,
has expanded to include more than 1.6 million current and former female employees,
and was certified on June 21 2004 as the largest class action lawsuit ever. :wtf:
Mondaq Business Briefing, November 1, 2004
In 2001, while more than two-thirds of Wal-Mart's hourly workers were female,
women held only one-third of managerial positions and made up less than 15 percent of store managers.
This is all despite women having had on average longer seniority and higher merit ratings
than their male counterparts. Neil Buckley and Caroline Daniel,
“Wal-Mart vs. the Workers: Labour Grievances Are Stacking Up Against the World’s Biggest Company,"”
Financial Times 11, 11/20/03
In 2001, women managers on average earned $14,500 less than their male counterparts.
Female hourly workers earned on average $1,100 less than male counterparts.Drogin 2003
In 2001, for the same job classification, women earned from 5 percent to 15 percent less than men,
even after taking into account factors such as seniority and performance.
Drogin 2003
Many more reasons at above link!
:grr: