Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-06-06 11:28 PM
Original message |
When your friends are in trouble |
|
You gather around and offer support. You make their worries your worries. So what does that mean for LIEberman? Looks like the only ones gathering around wringing their hands in despair are Republicans. Pretty damned telling.
|
Viva_La_Revolution
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-06-06 11:51 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Obama and B. Clinton are endorsing him |
|
which only makes me doubt the D's after their names...
|
CoffeeCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-07-06 12:01 AM
Response to Original message |
2. This is a "tragedy" for establishment politicians... |
|
What is happening to Lieberman is a threat to EVERY politician in DC.
They are quaking in their Cole Hahns--because the Lamont campaign--and the energy of Progressives who are behind it--have demonstrated that career politicians are no longer guaranteed re-election.
There is a great deal of growing energy from people who are against the war, against BushCo and for progressive ideals. We have power, and we are demonstrating that with the Lieberman race. We are showing them all that they had better start behaving in the best interests of this nation--or start looking for a new job.
My guess is that 75 percent of all politicians are corrupt jerks who are slaves to the corporations and other interests that do not benefit the best interests of the American people.
Lamont's success is a threat to all of them.
|
Reckon
(729 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-07-06 01:34 AM
Response to Original message |
3. It's about time politicians learn that lobbyist |
|
DO NOT ELECT THEM, the people do and the will of the people DOES MATTER!!!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:44 PM
Response to Original message |