Thanks to Lamont, Anti-War IS a Winning Election Year Issue.

[Philosoraptor]

Ned has broken the mold, and gone where no candidate has gone before, he has shown us the way to the end of the tunnel.

This might just be that big moment the anti war movement has been waiting for.

A Democrat with guts enough to call bush's war what it is, a total fucking disaster.

I know its not his only issue, but I believe it is the one that did the trick.

Hail Lamont!

[MadMaddie]

1. I hope that he pulls the rug from under Lieberwhore....

[Taverner]

2. So mote it be

[LuckyLib]

3. And this is only the beginning. In every race, every single race,

we need to be saying, "We don't want to hear about sacred stem cells, flag-burning, or any other diversion you're interested in. Speak to your stance on the war. Now!"

[laura888]

5. AGREED. War is THE issue! n/t

[TwentyFive]

4. Young US Soldiers are coming home from Iraq in CASKETS and MUTILATED

War is THE issue. It must be stopped. And Joe ain't gonna do. Sorry Joe...you've had 4 YEARS to wake up. Times up old pal.

[Jawja]

8. One Down, one on his way.

Remember Gephardt and Lieberman posing with * regarding the resolution to illegally invade a nation and kill civilians who were no threat to us?

[AlinPA]

6. War is a big issue, yes, but the cozy relationship that Lieberman has

with Bush** is what it is all about. Sucking up to Bush** (kisses and all) is what is driving my thinking the most.

[Ignoramus]

7. He's not anti-war of course, but less pro-war than Lieberman

He unambiguously supports Israel slaughtering innocent Lebanese people.

Anti-militarism should be the main strategy, or more simply, authenticity should be the strategy. Actually standing for something, rather than obviously pandering to what you think will get you votes.

[Philosoraptor]

9. !!!!!!!!!

[Philosoraptor]

10. ........

........