MaryRN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 07:30 PM
Original message |
3% in for CT Lamont 4927 Lieberman 2901 60/40% |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 07:32 PM
Response to Original message |
flyarm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 07:32 PM
Response to Original message |
2. woooo hooo mary so far!!!!!!!!!!! yipee!! |
Nutmegger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 07:33 PM
Response to Original message |
grytpype
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 07:34 PM
Response to Original message |
4. The smaller precincts are reporting first |
|
and they are expected to favor Lamont.
The cities will be last, closer to midnight, and they are supposed to go for Lieberman, although there are reports that turnout was low in those precincts.
|
speedoo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. Correct. That means LaMont's margin has to stay high. |
|
The longer this kind of margin is in place, the better Ned's chances.
|
KingFlorez
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 07:34 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Well, the space lab better be out of the the way |
|
Because I am about to go into orbit!
|
longship
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 07:36 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I can't believe that that's going to stay like that all night, but a 20% margin would be a complete blowout.
There's no way Lieberman runs as an Indie if the margin stays anywhere near this large.
|
speedoo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 07:37 PM
Response to Original message |
7. now 4%, still 60-40... amazing consistency. |
speedoo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. 7% in, 56% LaMont 44% LIAR |
|
Ned's lead is now nearly 3,000 votes. I think this may include Danbury, one of the smaller cities.
|
Tuttle
(919 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. where are you getting ###'s from? |
Orrin_73
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
Tuttle
(919 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
having trouble loading though: probably Lamont hacked that site also ;)
|
Orrin_73
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 07:47 PM
Response to Original message |
11. 7% in for CT Lamont - Lieberman 56/44% |
DemCapitalist
(32 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 07:49 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Sorry, Joe. But your time is up. |
Seabiscuit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 08:34 PM
Response to Original message |
15. With 19% of precincts reporting, Lamont 56%, Lieberman 44% |
|
Edited on Tue Aug-08-06 08:36 PM by Seabiscuit
|
Seabiscuit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 08:39 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Uh. Oh. The gap is narrowing. Lamont 52% Lieberman 48% with 55% of |
|
Edited on Tue Aug-08-06 08:41 PM by Seabiscuit
precincts reporting. http://web.wtnh.com/2006voteprimary/race200.htmlLamont leading by 6,537 votes.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:36 AM
Response to Original message |