speedoo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 08:26 PM
Original message |
38% in, LaMont's vote lead holding at 8,000. |
|
Very encouraging....54-46%.
We need somebody to call this for Ned soon.
|
WilliamPitt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 08:27 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Not if the cities aren't in yet. |
splat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Cf. Chicago 1960 presidential? n/t |
speedoo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. That's why I said we need someone to call it for Ned. |
|
They are clearly waiting for some city results to come in (some already have) before they call it.
|
Ken Burch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
6. Why would the cities be more pro-Lieberman? |
|
You'd think more progressive votes would be in the urban precincts.
|
SCRUBDASHRUB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
10. August 08, 2006 - 09:49PM ET |
|
U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary 537 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 71.79% Name Party Votes Pct Lamont, Ned Dem 100,425 51.61 Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 94,148 48.39
|
MercutioATC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 08:27 PM
Response to Original message |
KingFlorez
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. This is getting more and more close by the minute |
NeoConsSuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 08:32 PM
Response to Original message |
speedoo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 08:33 PM
Response to Original message |
8. 50% in. Ned's lead now eroding. |
|
It's less than 6,000 votes now.
|
speedoo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 08:37 PM
Response to Original message |
9. 54% in, margins unchanged. |
|
Ned's vote count holding for now.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:55 PM
Response to Original message |