*****THE OFFICIAL LAMONT/LIEBERMAN THREAD #5*******

[ncrainbowgrrl]

Previous threads:
#4: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1853801
#3: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1853341#1853560
#2:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1852769
#1: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=1852113&mesg_id=1852113

[stop the bleeding]

1. 608 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 81.28%

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary

Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 116,387 51.71
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 108,683 48.29

[jackpan1260]

2. what website are you getting this info from?

[NeoConsSuck]

4. Here:

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2006/by_state/CT_Page_0808.html?SITE=CTHARELN&SECTION=POLITICS

[stop the bleeding]

8. 618 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 82.62%

Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 119,100 51.83
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 110,686 48.17

[MrSlayer]

3. C'mon Ned!

Almost there.

:kick:

[TSIAS]

5. Drudge (FWIW)

Lamont wins

[derby378]

6. YYYEEAAAARRRGGGHHH!!!!

:headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang:

Ned Fuckin' Lamont's Unofficial Fight Song

:headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang:

Ned Fuckin' Lamont's Unofficial Fight Song

:headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang:

Ned Fuckin' Lamont's Unofficial Fight Song

:headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang:

[blonndee]

7. 82.62 in Lamont 51.83 Lieberman 48.17

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
618 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 82.62%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 119,100 51.83
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 110,686 48.17

[UTUSN]

9. haHAH!!1 a NEDhead held up a sign on Faux: "HANNITY SUCKS ASS"

COLMES was at LAMONT hqtrs signing off, and a cool NEDhead behind him held up the standard blue LAMONT campaign sign. Then he slowly turned it over, and there was a hand printed sign, "HANNITY SUCKS ASS"!!!!!!!!1

The camera stayed there a tad, then switched to HANNITY, who had a sheepish, martyred look. PRICELESS!!!1

[saigon68]

11. HANNITY SUCKS ASS PHOTO

[Guaranteed]

12. BWAHAHAHAH!!! nt

[stop the bleeding]

17. effing priceless

this should have it's own thread - I would nominate it

[UTUSN]

19. Excellent, my comrade!!!1 n/t

[Sugarcoated]

21. Beautifully put

Sweeeeet

[eleny]

24. Nice to see some truthiness on Fox!

[derby378]

26. YES!!!

:headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang:

Unofficial Fight Song of the "HANNITY SUCKS ASS" Guy

[Oak2004]

27. Priceless!!!

Almost makes me wish I was watching Faux.

[ncrainbowgrrl]

Oh what a great picture!

:hi:

[laundry_queen]

30. LOL! I needed a warning for that!

My pooooor keyboard! :rofl:

[IndianaGreen]

45. Isn't that precious?

The only thing that can top that tonight is watching Lieberman whining at his concession speech.

[jpak]

46. and the look on that guys face

:rofl:

[Swamp Rat]

50. Damn Moonbats are everywhere!!!

:rofl:

[tuvor]

53. Complain to the FCC!

[Dinger]

55. Whoa! Please Repost That So It Can Get It's Own Thread

Because it deserves it! Woweee!!!!!! I LOVE it!!!!!!! How di that guy get through????

[Dinger]

66. I See Someone Did : )

[LTR]

73. Here

I didn't know it was on this thread too until now.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1854500

[RandomUser]

63. Thanks for the pic!

That is just awesome :)

[RandomUser]

64. Thanks for the pic!

That is just awesome :)

[No DUplicitous DUpe]

77. Priceless! Thanks for sharing!

[Kittycat]

I wish that Poster Boy

Could be my avatar :dreamy

[Mr_Spock]

91. Best TV moment ever

I am so glad that was caught by someone.

[MaggieSwanson]

18. A thing of beauty.

Oh, and HANNITY SUCKS ASS!

:patriot:

[HeeBGBz]

25. Excellent!

Rock on, buddy.

[C_U_L8R]

29. the freeps are analyzing a screen grab

and they are aghast.. hahahhahhahahhaha

[UTUSN]

39. I wish we also had one of HANNITY's expression afterward n/t

[asthmaticeog]

10. At this rate, when does it become a numerical victory?

Anyone know? :shrug:

[mconvente]

23. according to avg persons per precinct

and at 130 left, thats a total of 46,233 votes left

With a 8500 vote lead for lamont, if his vote margin stays the same, its official with 24 precincts left

So we have some time to go people.

[asthmaticeog]

37. Thank you. nt

[UpInArms]

13. NYTs: 83% reporting - Lamont @ 51.8% - Lieberman @ 48.2%

Joseph I. Lieberman 110,686 48.2%
Ned Lamont 119,100 51.8%


83% of Precincts Reporting

[milkyway]

14. IT'S OVER. Lieberman needs to be +14% of remaining precincts.

Ned's +3.6% with 82% in, so Traitor Joe would need to be about +14% of remaining 18% of precincts. Doesn't seem possible unless heavy Lieberman precincts (if any exist) are still to report.

[The Backlash Cometh]

34. Have you ever noticed that when the Republican's candidates win,

they call it with about 60% of the votes in, but when it's a Dem win, they wait to the very end.

[aquart]

79. I have no problem waiting.

Think tantric sex.

[Sydnie]

44. I predicted it would be Ned with a 3.5% lead days ago

I hope it ends higher though, but it appears I was in the ball park.

[Borgnine]

15. Well, maybe Lieberman can still run for Senator on the planet Melmac.

I understand he's very popular there.

[quiet.american]

32. Thanks for the laugh! n/t

[Blackhatjack]

16. Anyone Know When Absentee Votes Are Counted & Added in CT?

Just wondering if we are in for a possible several thousand vote change when they get to the Absentee Ballots.

[blonndee]

20. 83.56% in Lamont 51.88 Lieberman 48.12

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
625 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 83.56%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 120,616 51.88
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 111,887 48.12

[kpete]

22. 83.56%

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
625 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 83.56%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 120,616 51.88
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 111,887 48.12

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2006/by_state/CT_Page_0808.html?SITE=CTHARELN&SECTION=POLITICS

[sazemisery]

42. you beat me kpete

[No DUplicitous DUpe]

56. Looks like we may have a winner...Lamont

Unless those last 15% vote crazy

[RUMMYisFROSTED]

28. Shades of Mexico.

:grr:

[TwilightZone]

36. ?

n/t

[Reckon]

31. Break out the champagne!.... woot....

WTG Ned!

[proud patriot]

33. ncrainbowgrrl you rock

:yourock:

[derby378]

40. She sure does!

:headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang:

Ned Lamont's Unofficial Fight Song

[MaggieSwanson]

41. I second that!

:toast:

[Catchawave]

43. ***DITTO****

Keep meaning to thank her, but I keep Gateway timing out :mad:

Keep on keeping on ncrainbowgrrl :toast:

[sazemisery]

35. Hartford Courant Results

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
625 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 83.56%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 120,616 51.88%
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 111,887 48.12%

[milkyway]

38. Is it too late for Lieberman to run in the Republican primary?

[OrangeCountyDemocrat]

47. Yes

[Olney Blue]

51. He could run for DeLay's seat in Texas.

[Raydawg1234]

48. Lamont's lead seems to be holding at 3%

[wellstone dem]

52. It's actually been increasing slowly, to almost 4% nt

[Raydawg1234]

57. ugghhh I'm bad with numbers

but thats awesome! :toast:

[No DUplicitous DUpe]

67. With 15% to go...is very big, too big to overcome

[JackORoses]

49. someone, please

hand joe's ass to him

[saigon68]

58. HERE he is photo (REJECTED)

[longship]

54. I want it to be Ned > 52%

That's within possiblilities here.

Currently, 51.88%!!!

Gotta beat Lieberman by > 4 points.

[sazemisery]

71. longship you may get your wish

[Pithy Cherub]

59. Somebody please get me Tinkerbells's cell phone number

I believe I believe I believe. Go Ned! :bounce:

[Armstead]

60. Hartford is the wild card at this point accoreding to WTIC

Accoerding to Channel 3, the vote from Hartford is the last source of votes to be counted.

[OrangeCountyDemocrat]

61. It's Really Going To Jump When Hartford Comes In

It will go to over 90%. Should be within the hour.

[AlinPA]

69. Sounds like Lieberman will carry Hartford? By how much?

[damntexdem]

62. He's holding the lead:

Edging back toward 52%, and up to 8700-vote lead, with 83.56% reporting.

But, then, maybe they haven't Diebolded him, yet.

[blonndee]

65. 83.32% in Lamont 51.9 Lieberman 48.1

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
627 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 83.82%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 120,890 51.90
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 112,060 48.10

[sazemisery]

68. results

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
627 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 83.82%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 120,890 51.90
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 112,060 48.10

[longship]

70. WoooHooooo. Go Ned, Go -- 83.82% in -- 3.8% gap and widening

627 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 83.82%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 120,890 51.90
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 112,060 48.10

[Pithy Cherub]

75. A tiny ray of cautious hope...

:woohoo:

[hang a left]

80. Who would have thought it was going to be that close??!!

Holy crap!

[Monkeyman]

72. Candy Crowley just said Joe will run as a Third party

[Seabiscuit]

78. Candy Crowley makes me ill. So does Loserman.

[The Count]

85. Candy&Joe - a team since the 2000 presidential elections!

They deserve each other!

[Guaranteed]

101. LOL Sore Loserman!

Where have we seen that before?

Use that one on any Repukes who brag about how they're going to vote for him....

[DemonFighterLives]

74. Candy Crowley saying Lieberman will go on no matter what

What an independent fella. :puke:
Edit: Candy doh!

[Monkeyman]

76. Stop That LOL

[DemonFighterLives]

82. She was so excited, I guess it rubbed off.

Stay the course joe :rofl

[speedoo]

92. 87%, Ned's lead the same...

almost 9,000 votes.

[54anickel]

94. Good, maybe he'll split the Repub votes - they do seem to love Joe.

Then again, he might split both the Rep and Dem and end up winning. :puke:
Lamont's gona have his work cut out for himself.

[OrangeCountyDemocrat]

81. Approx. 47,000 More Votes To Count nt

[ncrainbowgrrl]

83. People at Joementum's headquarters don't look too happy...

In fact- how many people ARE even in there?

[blonndee]

84. 86.63% in Lamont 52.83 Lieberman 48.18

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
648 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 86.63%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 124,528 51.82
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 115,803 48.18

[Balderdash]

100. Come on Ned!!!

I don't think I can take anymore! :silly:

And I think if Joe runs as an independant he'll really piss off Dems and
he'll lose.

[sazemisery]

86. 100 precincts more to go!!!

[derby378]

87. 86.63% of precincts reporting: Lieberman 48.18%, Lamont 51.82%

:headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang:

Ned Lamont's Unofficial Fight Song

:headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang:

[OrangeCountyDemocrat]

88. 86.63% Reporting Lamont - 51.82% Lieberman 48.18%

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
648 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 86.63%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 124,528 51.82
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 115,803 48.18

[mconvente]

89. in other dem primary news

WOW - look at CT house race district 41:

State House - District 41 - Dem Primary
4 of 4 Precincts Reporting - 100.00%
Name Party Votes Pct
Schmidt, Rita Dem 457 34.60
Wright, Elissa Dem 456 34.52
Kindle, Michael Dem 408 30.89

One vote - wow wow wow.

Are there run offs in CT? I suppose it's automatic recount though.

[Clarkie1]

90. It all depends on how "loyal" all those Dems are who voted for Lieberman.

I'm back from dinner, and looks like Lamont will achieve a narrow sort of victory tonight.

That's all well and good; it looks like the ones who will have a lot of the final say in the general election will be the Lieberman Democrats. Will they remain loyal to the Party and vote for Lamont, or will they vote for their man?

Time will tell...will be interesting to watch.

[longship]

93. CTBob reports good news from Hartford

From Hartford:
Reports coming in to the blog room are that Lamont won almost every precinct in Hartford -- if this is true, that's the ball game. Hard to get anything for attribution, but these are folks we have been working with all day.

[kpete]

95. 86.63%

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
648 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 86.63%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 124,528 51.82
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 115,803 48.18

[Borgnine]

96. Look at the bright side, Joe...

...you're in a one-way tie for second place!

[OrangeCountyDemocrat]

97. 40,000 Votes To Count......9,000 Vote Lead By Lamont

[Monkeyman]

I will say it Rove run away the Democrats are back

[Sydnie]

98. 648 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 86.63%

Lamont, Ned Dem 124,528 51.82
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 115,803 48.18

[longship]

99. Gap widening with 86.63% reporting

648 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 86.63%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 124,528 51.82
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 115,803 48.18

[ncrainbowgrrl]

102. Time for the next thread!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1854792