Armstead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 10:29 PM
Original message |
Joe gives negative speech. Lamont is a gentleman. |
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 10:30 PM
Response to Original message |
|
At Lieberman's immediate projecting. Can't wait till the *cough* FBI conclused it's 'investigation'.
|
YDogg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 10:30 PM
Response to Original message |
julialnyc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 10:31 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Joe can't even find the class |
|
To congratulate Ned in his concession speech and announce his run as an independent tomorrow. TACKY!
|
krkaufman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
13. *Hopefully*, the CT papers will cover the speeches ... |
|
... in tomorrow's papers, and will highlight the difference in tone and content. Lieberman looked the petty, hapless, entitled sore loser; and Lamont was an energized, direct reformist.
|
neoblues
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 10:32 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Lieberman Ingratious; Lamont Magnanimous/Class Act. |
|
The two aren't even to be compared. I can scarcely believe that old saucebag Lieberman was ever allowed to represent anyone for more than one term (if that).
|
bleever
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 10:35 PM
Response to Original message |
5. It was a great speech by Lamont. I like him even more now. |
|
Joe, Joe, Joe: take a couple of days before you do anything you might regret later.
|
Armstead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
He's registering tomorrow as an indepedent candidate.
|
bleever
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. Kiss that cabinet post goodbye, Joe. It's a shame. |
w4rma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 10:38 PM
Response to Original message |
regnaD kciN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. You need to update that graphic... |
|
Change the date to "2006."
|
tabasco
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 10:42 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Joe was totally disgusting! |
|
The classless display of all time.
|
jpkenny
(224 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 10:50 PM
Response to Original message |
11. I think that says it all. nt |
krkaufman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 10:53 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Lieberman asks Americans to tell him why he should be in the Senate |
|
My take on tonight's CT speeches...
Lieberman: - makes no mention of any specific reasons why he should be sent back to Washington, other than that he'd play nicer with those on the other side of the aisle. - decries partisan bickering, then whines about his "hacked" website. Petty little loser. - actually has the cluelessness to ask Americans to contact him with ideas on what he should do in Washington. If a guy who's been in Washington for 18 years, and just finished a Primary campaign, doesn't know why he should be in Washington -- then he SHOULD NOT BE THERE. Period.
Lamont: - Starts right off mentioning several important issues that he's looking to address in Washington (IIRC, Iraq, debt, jobs, ??) - Genial and respectful to Lieberman. No ill words or tone.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 11:00 AM
Response to Original message |