Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Marty Peretz: Joe lost, Clinton's fault

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 06:57 AM
Original message
Marty Peretz: Joe lost, Clinton's fault
Yep, that's what he says. How's that for gratitude?
THE CLINTON FACTOR:

I was for Joe Lieberman. I wrote an article about the race between him and Ned Lamont in Monday's Wall Street Journal. It was not neutral. But, though it got plenty of attention in the blogs and on television, it did not, alas, help Joe very much. Worse can be said of Bill Clinton's stumping in Connecticut for Joe (and Hillary's endorsement, too.) When Clinton came into the state, Lieberman and Lamont were running dead even in the polls, more or less. Clinton's appearance began Lieberman's decline. Within two or three days, Lieberman was down by ten points. (In the last few days of the campaign, Lieberman recovered considerably ... but not enough.) I know there's some nostalgia in the Democratic Party for Clinton and for Hillary, too. But for many, in the party and out, the Clintons are a nightmare. A nightmare, as James Joyce said, from which we are trying to awake. The common wisdom is that Al Gore would have won in 2000 had he embraced Clinton more or had he allowed Clinton to embrace him. Well, look at what happened to Joe.

http://www.tnr.com/blog/theplank?pid=29876
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. LOL... Well if that's so
Hat's off to Bill! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
19. We owe him a big fat
THANK YOU, BILL! Do ya think he had that in mind when he agreed to come to Connecticut? I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. Another tiresome Neo-con
Frankly, Clinton had nothing to do with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah that awful Clinton nightmare
Low gas prices, low unemployment, budget surpluses, international respect. Thank God they're over.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. And don't forget
Soldiers not getting killed for political reasons. And weapons inspectors neutering Iraq. Iraq did not have WMD, now that was Clinton's fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Eight years of peace, eight years of prosperity
How did we ever survive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. The Clenis strikes again!
It's EVIL I tells ya!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. Never underestimate its Earth-shaking power!
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 08:09 AM by hatrack
All hail CLENIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. Oh Crikey, it's Bill Clinton's fault!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Actually, the Clenis screwed Lieberman...
the size of its impact cannot be ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. Bill Clinton, A Nightmare?
from which we are trying to awake? And when you wake up george bush has been president for 5+ years - obviously not taken into consideration by the writer. I believe the author is a fucking idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. A year or so ago, Peretz wrote an editorial on Israel...
with which I agreed, and said so on DU. I profoundly apologize for even posting agreement with Peretz's words on DU; really he is too much of an ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
8. Really? I thought it was the Bush-kiss factor. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Torgo Johnson Donating Member (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
12. James Joyce has been dead for 65 years...
How would he know what the Clinton presidency was like?

It's hilarious. Clinton just switched his support to Lamont overnight and the DLC toadies
at The New Republic are already going after him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
13. They never miss a chance to blame Clinton for anything...
He was also responsible for last week's heat and the Red Sox' fall from first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
14. What an idiot!
The only evidence he offers is the classic post hoc fallacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. Well, it can't be Joe
TNR is the house organ for the Church of Joe. It can't be Lamont, Joe getting KOed by that dweeb would be... unseemly. Marty's already spilled rivers of ink on the Leftwing Internet Menace, to no avail. So, unlucky Bill, Marty's run out of options, it's his day in the box.

What's reeeally weird is that Marty is even more smitten with Gore than Lieberman. If there's a Dem heavyweight who could be called the anti-Joe, it'd be Al, yet Peretz would dump Joe in a flash for another Gore candidacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
16. Clinton did as much for Joe as
Sharpton and Jackson did for Lamont. Not much, imo.

In the end, people voted with their gut rather than with the public heads who were standing next to the candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
17. pft...
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
18. Blame it on clenis? Or desperation?
Or simply more people were being made aware of joe'shypocricy?(yes, all one word.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC