rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-19-06 04:59 PM
Original message |
goggle porn story on Wolf right now. |
Coexist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-19-06 05:01 PM
Response to Original message |
1. "Google has said they will fight this" |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-19-06 05:01 PM
Response to Original message |
2. they did not mention that yahoo, aol and microsoft already turned over |
Gabi Hayes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-19-06 05:03 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Har...I thought it was a story on Wolf involvement in porn..... |
|
well, he IS involved in political pornography, yes?
|
MissMarple
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-19-06 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. He is definitely involved in political obscenity. |
RC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-19-06 05:04 PM
Response to Original message |
4. google google for the google porn story. |
Coexist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-19-06 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Police police Police parking lots |
RC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-19-06 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
neoblues
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-19-06 05:17 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Damned Serious Issue Though... |
|
We just can't have the government being allowed to invade our privacy that way; today it's porn, tomorrow it's your financial records, your political speech (ex. this forum).
|
Matariki
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-19-06 06:43 PM
Response to Original message |
|
this might just mobilize people who otherwise wouldn't care that much. those people who foolishly think that the nsa/bush admin spying isn't significant, because only people who 'deserve it' are/will be spied on. these folks will absolutely FREAK out at the idea of their personal google searches being scrutinized - if you know what i mean.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:57 PM
Response to Original message |