The_Casual_Observer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-10-06 11:01 PM
Original message |
So far nobody in the press is asking what role did the "infiltrator" |
|
play in devising the "terror plot".
|
Warren Stupidity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-10-06 11:02 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Nobody in the press asks anything anymore. |
|
With a few notable exceptions it is the stenography corp.
|
Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-11-06 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
Eric J in MN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-10-06 11:07 PM
Response to Original message |
2. That's what I'd like to know, too. |
|
A real plot, or an agent provacateur?
|
Bjornsdotter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-10-06 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
radwriter0555
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-10-06 11:10 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Perhaps the same roles the 9 unidentified apparent infiltrators had on 911 |
|
I would have to assume.
9 of the 911 hijackers remain unidentified to this day... I've come to realize that most likely these were the infiltrators we commonly see in all the terror plots - both real and fake -- that have surfaced over the past 5 years.
I'm sure this is why we still don't know who those 9 people were. The infiltrators have constistently become the ringleaders in all these wild schemes.
Epiphane time.
|
Eric J in MN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-10-06 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Are you saying that 9 of the hijackers were govt agents? NT |
radwriter0555
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-11-06 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. I'm now believing it's entirely possible... or agents for the factions of |
|
the 'government'.
We don't know who those 9 people were... not one single clue and all inquiry as to who they were has been resolutely pushed aside. So, with a critical thought, you have to wonder and ask why.
9 people, completely unaccounted for, involved in the worst mass murder or terrorist attack ever made against a developed nation, and no one wants to know precisely who all the perpetrators were? That makes no sense.
When people are killed in a murder in a house in a neighborhood, no stone is left unturned to track down the perpetrators, find out who those specific people were, and what their motive was.
And no one ever took credit or made any statement about why that deed was done. (No, bin laden didn't take credit, he stated that he knew about 911 but didn't take part. Bin Laden has always taken credit for his deeds)
|
Rosemary2205
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-11-06 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. I'd like to know more about this |
|
can you link me to information about the "unaccounted for 9". Obviously I've missed something important.
Thanks.
|
radwriter0555
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-11-06 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. Well, while google is always your best friend, start with this... |
|
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stmhttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&rls=DVXA%2CDVXA%3A2006-01%2CDVXA%3Aen&q=hijackers+aliveKeep in mind that 5 years later, almost all the media stories have long been archived. I had several from CNN in my cache for years, but they're now gone. Sites like whatreallyhappened.com still have them archived, and it's a good site. You should read for yourself and make up your own mind. A lot of stuff out there is wild tin foil hat stuff, but it's all based on reality.
|
Rosemary2205
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-11-06 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
Eric J in MN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-11-06 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
12. If they were government agents, they were EXTREMELY |
|
...devoted to go on a mission in which they were guaranteed to die if it succeeded.
|
CJCRANE
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-11-06 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
14. It's called deep cover |
|
and all the more reason to get agents in there if the stakes are that high.
|
Norrin Radd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-11-06 02:12 AM
Response to Original message |
10. Perhaps the infiltrator told them about weirder, more sophisticated |
Snivi Yllom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-11-06 09:13 AM
Response to Original message |
13. I have heard commentators say it's 'cover' for electronic surveillance |
|
When MI5 says they have an "agent" inside, it's cover for electronic surveillance.
When MI5 says they have "surveillance intelligence", it's cover for an actual agent.
For obvious reasons they don't want to publicize the actual means of methods. We may never find out, it's against the law in Britain to release or leak state secrets, and it will land you in jail, even after you have left the government.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:19 PM
Response to Original message |