Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush at 33%, Govt's Complicity in 9/11 at 36%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
democraticinsurgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 10:25 AM
Original message
Bush at 33%, Govt's Complicity in 9/11 at 36%
Discuss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. There are more people in America against the Iraq war...
than people who favor the President as well.

These facts are somehow lost on the MSM which continues to call anti-war activists far-left radicals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds to me like 31% is still up for grabs. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democraticinsurgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. good observation
to me that's why the 9/11 truth movement is the absolute key. i'm shocked at the 36% figure, which includes people who think Bushco did it, as well as people who think they knew about it and let it happen.

there are a lot of political activists and intelligent people, including a large bit of DU, that falls into this category. If we can break 9/11 it will wash away all this terra terra terra bs and begin the long march off the short pier for Bushco.

If that doesn't happen, they will continue to try to manipulate the news so they can bring enough of the 31% back into the "fear" orbit in time for November.

Onward truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. WHY GENERAL SHOOMAKER DIDN'T YOU TELL CLINTON?
So the responsibility for stopping DIA program Able Danger, which had Identified Atta and 3 other hijackers and linked them to 56 other al-Queda terrorists overseas, has been laid at the feet of Bill Clinton--except he and Richard Clarke were never told about it at all.

That's right. Bill Clinton was never told about Able Danger and the ID of Atta because Richard Clarke was never told about AD. How do I know? He never wrote about it in his book, nor did he testify about it's existence before the 9-11 Commission!

You see Richard Clarke was known for being obsessed with Osama Bin Laden and HE was the guy the neo-con moles did not want to find out about Atta and the gang. Schoomaker and the neo-cons knew telling the FBI would inform Clarke and then Mr. Laser Beam himself, President of the United State William Jefferson Clinton, would have gotten involved--and the Pearl Harbor-type attack would never take place (the neo-cons talked about the need for a Pearl Harbor-type attack before the PNAC Plan would be accepted by the American people--so when one presented itself, they let it happen).

General Pete Schoomaker, who were later heavily rewarded by the neo-cons in the Bush Administration, blocked the upward motion of the DIA information by having Shaffer and Philpott meet with Pentagon lawyers opinions--lawyers who were rubberstamping ridiculous legal opinions to carry out the neo-con plan. These certain people were neo-cons in the Clinton Administration, covertly carrying out the PNAC plan to let a Pearl Harbor-type attack occur so Iraq and 6 other countries could be invaded.


http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/8/24/124834/678
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democraticinsurgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Richard Clarke is "one of them"
as far as I'm concerned. In fact there's a fair amount of evidence that he was right there on 9/11 helping run the operation.

Clarke to me represents the apex of the "incompetence" limited hangout dance that Bushco did for the 9/11 commission.

Anyone who was obsessed with Bin Laden is not to be trusted as someone who is telling us what they really know.

That's my 2 cents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC