OregonBlue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-11-06 11:23 AM
Original message |
If we had spent $300 BILLION on going after "terrorist" instead of |
|
going into Iraq, would we be safer? Simple question Dems need to pose to the nation.
|
Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-11-06 11:27 AM
Response to Original message |
1. If we screened air cargo, we'd probably be safer. nt |
FormerDittoHead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-11-06 11:27 AM
Response to Original message |
2. $300b - just the downpayment on Iraq... n/t |
|
Edited on Fri Aug-11-06 11:27 AM by FormerRushFan
|
OregonBlue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-11-06 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. Of course you're right but that $300 billion would have bought a lot |
|
of port screening, air marshalls, translators, etc., etc., etc. Dems need to ask the people if they think there money was well spent? or was it wasted on a Quest for Oil and power!!
|
Goblinmonger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-11-06 11:28 AM
Response to Original message |
3. If we had spent $300 billion on |
|
education, AIDS research, stem-cell research, homelessness, improving the inner cities, or a plethora of other things, wouldn't we be better off than we are now.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 01:54 AM
Response to Original message |