Herman Munster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-12-06 11:43 PM
Original message |
This cease fire is just insane to me |
|
So they have to stop killing each other at Monday at 8am, but for the next day it's fine to continue killing each other? And you know both sides are going to go full force the next day and try to kill and cause as much damage as possible before the cease fire.
Why can't they stop the fucking killing NOW, not Monday at 8am?
|
JohMunich99
(155 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-12-06 11:45 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Everyone has to get the memo |
|
If there is a cease-fire immediately, but some guy doesn't know it, he'll "break" the cease fire and they'll need to go back to the negotiation table.
|
Kagemusha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. That doesn't explain the conscious escalating by itself. |
|
Though the reasons seem clear enough to me. Bargaining chips, territory control, bypassing and trapping Hezbollah forces in the hope they can be cleaned out later somehow.
|
uppityperson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-12-06 11:59 PM
Response to Original message |
|
They can send out messages to everyone saying "stop" now.
|
Melynn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 12:06 AM
Response to Original message |
3. I thought the same thing |
|
What about the people who are going to be killed between now and next Monday. Don't those people count. It's beyond insane.
Leaders of nations play their power games and normal average people die. All the people of the world should just refuse to engage in war.
|
JohMunich99
(155 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
But they don't have everyone's cell phone number. The news has to get out so that someone doesn't break the cease fire before they realize that one is even going on.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 12:43 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Welcome to DU, bridge. I feel the same way. |
breakaleg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 12:52 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Up until now, Israel has supposedly held back on the ground invasion out of fear of high Israeli casualties. And the day after they announce a resolution to stop the fighting, they increase their assault, and they have possibly the highest number of daily casualties to date.
|
Jazz2006
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 02:02 AM
Response to Original message |
9. I understand your point, but |
|
would you prefer no ceasefire?
All ceasefires have to come with a date and time, and in this case, it's timed to coincide with a peacekeeping force being in place, which makes sense.
|
Posteritatis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 02:42 AM
Response to Original message |
10. *All* significant historical ceasefires have had advance warning |
|
Everything up to and including the WWI Armistice and the unconditional surrenders of Germany and Japan in WWII had dates and hours of ceasefire. You simply can't light-switch these sorts of things on and off. Yes, people often try to rush to do as much damage as possible in the interim, but as other people have said, declaring the ceasefire to be effective Right This Second just doesn't cut it. That would be massively violated to the point of offing the process.
So you establish a time, as soon as possible, when everybody is fully aware of the fact that You Don't Shoot After This Time, and accept what happens between declaring the time and the ceasefire itself. Pretty much anything less is unrealistic - more to the point, impossible.
|
Skittles
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 03:49 AM
Response to Original message |
|
a sad commentary on human beings
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:00 AM
Response to Original message |