Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Terrorists Are Waiting For The Democrats Here To Take Control"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:42 PM
Original message
"Terrorists Are Waiting For The Democrats Here To Take Control"
Republicans (and their friends in the media) have been falling all over themselves to equate a victory for Democrats at the polls this November, wtih a victory for terrorists.

Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah is quoted by the Salt Lake Tribune as saying: "Terrorists are waiting for the Democrats here to take control, let things cool off and then strike again." (article here: http://www.sltrib.com/utah/ci_4194186)

Hatch has plenty of company.

Dick Cheney suggested that Ned Lamont's victory over Joe Lieberman might encourage the "Al Qaeda types."

An anchor on CNN's Headlines News asked the question "...might some argue, as some have, that Lamont is the al Qaeda candidate?"

Fox News' Cal Thomas wrote in his colum that Ned Lamont's victory "completes the capture of the Democratic Party by its Taliban wing."

Republicans might think that terrorists are itching for Democrats to take control this November.

But the CIA had another assessment during the 2004 Presidential campaign.

Remember the October surprise of the 2004 Presidential campaign? It came just four days before Americans went to the polls to vote. A videotape of Osama bin Laden was released. In the tape, he criticized George W. Bush.

Many Bush supporters claimed the videotape was proof that Osama wanted John Kerry to win the election.

But the CIA had another view.

During a 5:00 PM meeting on October 29, 2004 (the day the videotape was released), Deputy CIA Director John McLaughlin began by stating "Bin-Laden certainly did a nice favor today for the President." CIA officers gathered around the tabled nodded in agreement at McLaughlin's assessment that Osama had done Bush a favor.

So just why did Osama want Bush to remain in office a few more years? Why was he threatened by the prospect of a President John Kerry?

Some CIA analysts felt that in part, Osama realized that Bush's policies, including the Guantanamo prison camp, the death and torture of Iraqis at Abu Ghraib, and the ongoing violence in Iraq, were helping Al Qaeda recruit an entire new generation of jihadists. In short: George Bush was Osama's most effective recruitment poster. Jami Miscik, CIA Deputy Associate Director for Intelligence, said "Certainly, he would want Bush to keep doing what he’s doing for a few more years."

According to Ron Suskind in his new book The One Percent Doctrine, the CIA analysts fell silent, as the hard truths began to sink in for them. And they wondered, what did it say about U.S. policy that Osama wanted Bush to keep doing his thing for four more years.

And I believe that former President Clinton had it just right when he said during a campaign event for Sen. John Kerry in 2004: "One of Clinton's laws of politics is this: If one candidate's trying to scare you, and the other one's trying to get you to think; if one candidate's appealing to your fears, and the other one's appealing to your hopes; you better vote for the person who wants you to think and hope."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. It doesn't matter when it happens, we will be blamed, so I say . . .
there is no reason not to pursue a Progressive agenda anyway, because we are damned if we do and damned if we don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MnFats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Of course, immediately after 9-11 Bush and Cheney promised...
...they would never, ever use 9-11 for political purposes. Why, how dare you suggest such a craven thing! We would NEVER politicize a national tragedy!


but now, come to think of it, EVERY goddamn thing they have done represents politicizing of 9-11.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angstlessk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hey I tried...terra diddle should be on every Democrats lips..
tarradiddle: noun: a trivial lie: pretentious or silly talk or writing

terra-diddle: noun: pretentious or silly talk or writing by Republicans regarding terrorism.


What Orin Hatch said...just more terra-diddle by repukes....Cheney...hey the terra-diddle expert. Short and sweet and says it ALL!

Thanks to PeoplePC for their 'Word of the Day'


Encarta's definition's link: http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/features/dictionary/Dicti...

Encarta's definition: noun Definition: 1. idle talk: nonsense or idle talk 2. lie: a small lie

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. remember this! When LIHOP ver 2.0 happens after the Dems win
and you KNOW it will happen (it being the Dam win, AND the LIHOP v2.0)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. yes, the REAL terrorists know that Dems will win and have major
strikes planned. Then they can sit back and say, "see, we told you so."
These people (* et al.) are the scum of the earth. I feel resigned to them insinuating themselves on We The People to the bitter and catastrophic End.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. Message to the Orrinator: If so, the attacks will come from Afghanistan
because Chimpy took the troops away from Afghanistan (where Osama is) and sent them to Iraq (where Osama isn't).

By the way, isn't "orinar" Spanish for "urinate?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. If diebold can't stop the votes from being counted, My guess would be
that a MIHOP will take them out in session before committees are staffed. (KEN LAY) Timing is everything. One small nuke and Norquist won't need a bathtub.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Hi DiktatrW!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. Since the Republicans ARE the terrorists
it doesn't surprise me that they might pull something after Dems win in November. After all Cheney is control of Al Queada
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wanpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. This would actually be funny if there weren't some idiots out there that
actually believe this crap!

:mad: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
11. Republican cowards whining like little babies. WAAAAAHH!!! WAAAHHH!!!
These cowards are the Nazi's in your future - watch as they "go all out" to try and scare Americans with their cowardly words.

"The only thing we have to fear, is fear itself"



Imagine having non-cowards in positions of power.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC