2Design
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-19-06 01:45 PM
Original message |
paparazzi - why don't celebs get together and hire |
|
their own to go after these annoying paparazzi - track them, photograph them, and dig up dirt on all of the people stalking celebs and publish it - I am sure these people who hunt celebs for tibits of pictures or news for the tabloids have lots of skeletons in their closets - fight back in a way that will let these intruders know what it is like to have your life flashed in public with lies and exaggerations
|
Lerkfish
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-19-06 01:51 PM
Response to Original message |
1. that would not be a solution. |
|
there is papparrazi because there is a demand for photos.Until you eliminate the demand, you cannot eliminate the paparrazi
besides, you're essentially threatening to expose people who the public won't care about, so you accomplish nothing.
|
kiahzero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-19-06 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Not to mention that paparazzi aren't "public figures" under the law |
|
Which means that it's a lot easier for them to defend themselves from libel.
|
Jed Dilligan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-19-06 02:07 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Why doesn't someone do this to the Republicans?
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-19-06 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. lol! "RockStar Republicans" |
|
Follow them around snapping shots all day, rummage through their garbage for interesting tidbits. All for their "adoring public"...
|
OwnedByFerrets
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-19-06 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. I like "your" idea Dilligan, |
|
Edited on Sat Aug-19-06 02:10 PM by OwnedByFerrets
and about the OP, most celebs do NOT mind the publicity, in fact, need it. What would PHilton be without it.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:15 PM
Response to Original message |