Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"We do not want to destabilize the regime of Saddam Hussein"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 02:30 PM
Original message
"We do not want to destabilize the regime of Saddam Hussein"
This has always been something that bothered me, although it didn't hit me until today why.
President George Bush (41) told the US forces to stop. "Withdraw from Iraq", was the order which came down from President George Bush. "We do not want to destabilize the regime of Saddam Hussein"
Only a few hours after Operation Desert Storm had started, the US Army was 30 miles from Baghdad. There was no military force at all between the US Army and Baghdad. The only army Saddam Hussein still had was far from Baghdad and still on the border with Kuwait. The US Army had only to walk into Baghdad and take over. Not a shot would have been fired. There was nobody to stop them.
General Norman Schwartzkoff has spoken of this many times and many places. He more or less had Saddam within grasp, but was told that (paraphrase) this wasn't the "mission".
So what was the mission? To destabilize the US? To rob the treasury?
To fill the pockets of the rich croneys?
Timing is everything--and even though the timing was right to take out Saddam, the timing wasn't right to make all the money they could.
The Republicans didn't have a stranglehold on the American populace--as shown by their overwhelming election of Clinton.
However, the Clinton Presidency gave them PLENTY of time to do planning.
And plenty of time to rally support of their hatemongering base.
Enter Rush Limpaugh and the hate radio team.
The mission was ALWAYS to go back to Iraq, but only when the spoils of war could line the pocket of the most wealthy in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. The mission at the time was to stop Saddam from taking Jr's oil ...
... the 'line in the sand' drawn by Poppy was just outside Jr's Harken Oil fields.

Poppy turned a blind eye to Iraq overrunning Kuwait, but when Saddam started salivating over the adjacent area which the * family and partners had a shitload of holdings in, then he called it a war.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. yep.
That's it in a nutshell.:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC