|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-20-06 06:56 AM Original message |
Military recruiters molest, rape potential enlistees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-20-06 07:03 AM Response to Original message |
1. Rummy, you're doing a great job... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soothsayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-20-06 07:04 AM Response to Original message |
2. Ok, so then WHY do they enlist afterwards? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pooja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-20-06 07:10 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. It seems to me the recruiter is using job positioning within the branch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-20-06 07:17 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Maybe for some it is be raped and shut up or back to prison they go? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intaglio (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-20-06 07:05 AM Response to Original message |
3. Also posted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
izzie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-20-06 07:13 AM Response to Original message |
5. My God but what is going on? That is nuts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmejack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-20-06 08:10 AM Response to Original message |
7. 1 in 200 recruiters disciplined |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-20-06 08:34 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Your simple solution of National Service to fix this has one major drawback |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmejack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-20-06 08:57 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. A mandatory draft would take every eighteen year old |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-20-06 09:45 AM Response to Reply #9 |
14. A mandatory draft would NOT take every eighteen year old |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmejack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-20-06 10:00 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Your proposal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-20-06 10:24 AM Response to Reply #8 |
16. There's no relation between the two subjects-except that conscription |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnnyLib (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-20-06 09:27 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. How about pressure down the line on recruiters? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-20-06 09:13 AM Response to Original message |
10. Never trust anyone in a uniform! (What *do* they teach kids these days?) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qazplm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-20-06 09:31 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-20-06 10:28 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. A good joke to live by -- yes, absolutely, never trust anyone in a uniform |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niallmac (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-20-06 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
13. In America? WTF? This nation needs a time out. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-20-06 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
18. This is a very disturbing situation and there is no way it can be ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnnyLib (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-20-06 11:58 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Yes, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-20-06 01:10 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. I know how that goes as well...but a Sr NCO or a Commander would be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 10th 2024, 07:12 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC