Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

press interview Gen. Turner was asked if the troops had all the Body

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 07:04 PM
Original message
press interview Gen. Turner was asked if the troops had all the Body
armour they needed..

he looked like his mother just caught him jerking off... and mumbled that they did

is there any word from the trenches about the body and HUMV armor in Iraq..??

thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. No, there wasn't nearly enough armor. Couldn't search DU, but
I googled it for you. There were lots of articles here earlier this week.

http://www.journalnow.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=WSJ%2FMGArticle%2FWSJ_ColumnistArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1128769350367&path=!opinion&s=1037645509163

Tuesday, January 17, 2006
Body Armor

Winston-Salem Journal

The U.S. Army will soon send additional body armor to protect American soldiers in Iraq. It's about time.

The Army announced its decision Wednesday, about three years too late. American forces should have never invaded Iraq without the body armor they need, and with which this country can certainly afford to provide them.

In the future, when the history of this period is written and when Americans are removed from the internal partisanship that so colors current views of the war, the body-armor issue may well be the biggest stain on the Bush administration's record.

There is no reasonable justification for the world's richest nation to skimp on armor that can protect the lives of its sons and daughters. If Congress were more interested in doing its job, rather than raising campaign funds and fighting partisan battles, it would be tearing the administration's defense budget apart and reworking it with adequate armor as the top priority.

The armor issue is just one more indictment of Bush administration performance in this war. The administration led the nation to war with bogus claims of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction and Iraqi ties to Osama bin Laden. Then it failed to adequately plan for the establishment of peace after major combat operations ended, leaving the Army and Marine Corps woefully understaffed. Amid all these mistakes was the negligence of inadequately protecting the men and women the administration sent into harm's way.


more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. How can he lie like that?
He knows he's lying, why doesn't that bother him? Why doesn't he support his Troops? Why doesn't he, as a General , care about the ground Troops? He should be ashamed of himself!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
recovering democrat Donating Member (365 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Specifics
Turner is answering for the 101st Airborne which he commands. They probably, very likely, do have the body armor. He replies for soldiers "under his command". That does NOT answer for the entire military force in Iraq though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC