Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain Backtracks On Iraq War Criticism...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 11:48 PM
Original message
McCain Backtracks On Iraq War Criticism...
"I have never intended my concern that the American people be fully informed about the conduct and consequences of the war to indicate any lessening of my support for our mission there," McCain said in the statement.

He complained in an appearance Tuesday about major mistakes by the administration, such as underestimating the size of the task and the sacrifices necessary. The comment prompted criticism from the right and left that McCain was flip-flopping, contradicting his backing for Bush's policy.

In a March 2003 interview on MSNBC's "Hardball With Chris Matthews," McCain was asked whether he believed the people of Iraq would treat U.S. forces as liberators. "Absolutely. Absolutely," the senator replied.

McCain should not even run for president, we've had one clown too many already, this is the best the repugs got??!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm ashamed I gave McCain $75.00 in 2000
Edited on Fri Aug-25-06 11:54 PM by Erika
Only to see him hug W after W ran his family into the ground. McCain's a a sick GOP jerk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I feel your pain. I didn't give him money but
I voted for him in the Rethuglican primary here in TX to get him on the ticket instead of Bush* because I knew what disaster W would be.

Geez, I can't figure where he stands on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
az chela Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I campaigned for him when he ran against bush as I felt
anyone was better than bush.The last 2 years I realize they are the bobsey twins and I have emailed him and told him how sorry I was that
I ever supported him and would never be that stupid again.I also called his office and told his aide the same thing,I ranted for 15 minutes against mccain and the republican party.The guy kept trying to
get off the phone and I just kept ranting.
Geez that felt good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maccagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. Party over Principle
It's been that way for John McCain for years. That "straight-talking maverick" label the MSM tagged him with has been his cover (and theirs). Shame on McCain and the media!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. Soon, repugs will be claiming the Dems are the ones who want to stay the
Course while Bush continues his sick rant of "not as long as I'm president" or as long as I don't become the quack-quack lame duck...

What would Bush do with his loss of power?? probably go back to Crawford for the remaining 2 years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 04:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. McCain has no spine...
Edited on Sat Aug-26-06 04:44 AM by TwoSparkles
He starts to make sense, then Rove calls him on the bat phone and strong arms him back into complacency.

Obviously, Junior wanted a public acknowledgment from McCain. Why else would McCain use the media to backtrack.

Junior and the rest of the thugs, own McCain.

He doesn't wipe his hiney, unless he has their permission.

It's pathological to watch McCain kow tow to a group of people who insulted his
child, cut down his military service and accused him of not caring about veterans.

BushCo has some emotional stranglehold on McCain, and I think McCain's suffering
from Stockholm Syndrome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. What is just totally mind bending ...
is the media ... I mean, on Hardball, Mathews and his guests just basically laughed about the fact that the media will give him a pass on it because they have him stereotyped in such a positive way ... Jesus, if Hillary, Gore ... Whoever, had done this, they would be on him like pirannah ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 04:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. Ha. . . at what velocity do "flip - flops"
become ever increasing spin?

He should be so dizzy by now that sitting upright is a problem..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 05:26 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. McLame want to be Prez so bad that he will say and do
anything. He tried to distance himself somewhat from the Busholini Regime but now he is back to kissing their asses. He is a hypocritical jerk. He lost his integrity after he entered politics. The Corp. Media helps him peddle his "Maverick" shtick.

by Doug Ireland

John McCain, the media's darling, has found a clever way around his own campaign finance reform law to take big corporate bucks in furtherance of his political ambitions while carrying water for the corporate mammoth providing the dough. But the national press is ignoring the story.


The Associated Press first ran the story of John McCain's odorous but lucrative Senatorial service to the communications giant Cablevision on the afternoon of March 7. But, while some local papers in McCain's home state (like the East Valley Tribune) have run the story, nothing has as yet made it into the print editions of the New York Times, the L.A. Times, the Washington Post, or any of the half-dozen other big city dailies I checked (although, if one searches the hundreds of AP stories available on the Post's website on its Politics page by clicking on "Latest Wire Reports," one can find it there--but how many readers would bother to do that?) One notable exception: the Kansas City Star.


Here's what the AP's investigation found:


McCain repeatedly intervened on behalf of a policy Cablevision favored -- one which "congressional and private studies conclude could make cable more expensive" -- while his chief political adviser, Rick Davis (who's masterminding McCain's probable '08 presidential rerun) solicited $200,000 in contributions from Cablevision to an institute that promotes McCain and pays Davis a $110,000 annual salary.


The Reform Institute was set up to promote McCain and his issues--especially campaign finance reform, embodied in the famous McCain-Feingold law. This Institute is "a tax-exempt group that touts McCain's views and has showcased him at events since his unsuccessful 2000 presidential campaign," and it "often uses the senator's name in press releases and fund-raising letters and includes him at press conferences," the AP says. And, of course, it provides a cushy sinecure with no heavy lifting for McCain's main man, Davis, as he prepares the pontificating Senator's next presidential run. Cablevision's contributions account for a whopping 15% of the Institute's budget.


http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0309-35.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 05:32 AM
Response to Original message
10. Wow, THAT episode of "distancing" from shrub didn't last too long, did it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. They must have him by the balls on something.
Highly coercible. Security risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. When he let the torture "signing statement" go through
that's exactly what I thought..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC