onethatcares
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-26-06 03:27 PM
Original message |
is it permissible to post a website that might be |
|
"thought provoking"? I dabble at one that has a strong fellowship of the dark side, the progressives are a minority to say the least. We have a difficult time responding to some things posted and could use some better folks to help out.
|
unhappycamper
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-26-06 03:35 PM
Response to Original message |
1. To be safe, I suggest you check with the Admins before posting. |
msongs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-26-06 05:09 PM
Response to Original message |
2. why not? its ok to have icons of murderous sociopathic kid killers |
|
if some people can glorify a guy who tied kids to chairs, put eye coverings on them, then blew their brains out with a pistol, what's a big deal about a website of the dark side? does the previously described behavior not lean to the dark side?
Msongs www.myspace.com/msongs
|
tkmorris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-26-06 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
What are you talking about?
|
Deja Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-26-06 05:11 PM
Response to Original message |
4. There are, occasionally, posts that folks on 'the other side' and we |
|
agree on entirely.
If the viewpoints are in agreement, why not?
|
onethatcares
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-26-06 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. already asked the mods here, |
|
just waiting for a reply. I know, I know, it's ok if they infiltrate progressive sites, but here I am trying to be courteous. Gaud, I'm farked in the big picture.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:31 PM
Response to Original message |