Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AIPAC on Trial.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 11:36 PM
Original message
AIPAC on Trial.
http://www.counterpunch.org/petras01072006.html

AIPAC on Trial By JAMES PETRAS

In August 2004, the FBI and the US Justice Department counter-intelligence bureau announced that they were investigating a top Pentagon analyst suspected of spying for Israel and handing over highly confidential documents on US policy toward Iran to AIPAC which in turn handed them over to the Israeli Embassy. The FBI had been covertly investigating senior Pentagon analyst, Larry Franklin and AIPAC leaders, Steven Rosen and Keith Weissman for several years prior to their indictment for spying. On August 29, 2005 the Israeli Embassy predictably hotly denied the spy allegation. On the same day Larry Franklin was publicly named as a spy suspect. Franklin worked closely with Michael Ledeen and Douglas Feith, then Undersecretary for Defense in the Pentagon, in fabricating the case for war with Iraq. Franklin was the senior analyst on Iran, which is at the top of AIPAC's list of targets for war.

As the investigation proceeded toward formal charges of espionage, the pro-Israeli think tanks and neo-con ideologues joined in a two-prong response. On the one hand some questioned whether "handing over documents" was a crime at all, claiming it involved "routine exchanges of ideas" and lobbying. On the other hand, Israeli officials and media denied any Israeli connection with Franklin, minimizing his importance in policy-making circles, while others vouched for his integrity.

<snip>

As the investigation proceeded toward formal charges of espionage, the pro-Israeli think tanks and neo-con ideologues joined in a two-prong response. On the one hand some questioned whether "handing over documents" was a crime at all, claiming it involved "routine exchanges of ideas" and lobbying. On the other hand, Israeli officials and media denied any Israeli connection with Franklin, minimizing his importance in policy-making circles, while others vouched for his integrity.

<snip>

Never in the history of the United States had so many leading Congress members from both parties pledged their support for an organization under suspicion of spying, based only on information supplied by the suspect and in total ignorance of the federal prosecutor's case. Contrary to the bipartisan Congressional support for AIPAC, a poll of likely voters found that 61 per cent believed that AIPAC should be asked to register as an agent of a foreign power and lose its tax exempt status. Only 12 per cent disagreed. Among American Jews, 59 per cent were not sure, while 15 per cent strongly agreed and 15 per cent strongly disagreed (Zogby International, Sept. 25, 2004). Clearly many Americans have serious doubts about the loyalty and nature of AIPAC activities, contrary to their elected representatives. The federal spy investigation proceeded despite Executive and Congressional opposition, knowing that it had the backing of the great majority of US citizens.
More.... http://www.counterpunch.org/petras01072006.html

*********************
Today Franklin was sentenced to 12 years for his crimes against the people of the United States. I think the term Franklin recieved is hardly relevant(though it is not petty, and shows the seriousness of the crime for which he was convicted), what we need to understand is the aims of the organization, and how harmful it is to an agenda of a peaceful foreign policy.

As the article points out, this lobby for militarism has an annual budget of $60 million, and membership of 60,000 mostly affluent people. (though as the poll above indicates, it is wildly unpopular with most of the US public, but most of them do not contribute to political campaigns) It is no wonder that both Parties would come to its defense.

This case is about attempting to influence US policy, and to its detriment. It is about militarism and the push for a belligerent foreign policy against other nations. All who care for peace should take notice of this organization and its aims. This is certainly not the only organization that pushes for US intervention abroad, but it is probably the most powerful, and the most feared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. I used to belong to AIPAC. Time to rejoin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Lobbyists AND agents for a foreign government
It really is time to clean up K street.

Why not?
ans. Big bucks like Abramoff, only these guys grease both sides of the aisle.

Are we really serious about reform? About taking back our government from lobbyists like these who pushed Congress to get us into Iraq. I agreed with Jim Moran's take on this question.

http://www.counterpunch.org/cockburn03152003.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. Come here, lil' Dougie I have something for you...a subpoena
"Franklin worked closely with Michael Ledeen and Douglas Feith, then Undersecretary for Defense in the Pentagon, in fabricating the case for war with Iraq."

I would so like a full inquiry into the 'lead-up' to the invasion of Iraq. Front page everyday...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC