Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush and Saddam Should Both Stand Trial, Says Nuremberg Prosecutor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Ian_rd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 01:59 PM
Original message
Bush and Saddam Should Both Stand Trial, Says Nuremberg Prosecutor
Bush and Saddam Should Both Stand Trial, Says Nuremberg Prosecutor
Aaron Glantz OneWorld US

SAN FRANCISCO, Aug 25 (OneWorld) - A chief prosecutor of Nazi war crimes at Nuremberg has said George W. Bush should be tried for war crimes along with Saddam Hussein. Benjamin Ferencz, who secured convictions for 22 Nazi officers for their work in orchestrating the death squads that killed more than 1 million people, told OneWorld both Bush and Saddam should be tried for starting "aggressive" wars--Saddam for his 1990 attack on Kuwait and Bush for his 2003 invasion of Iraq.

"Nuremberg declared that aggressive war is the supreme international crime," the 87-year-old Ferencz told OneWorld from his home in New York. He said the United Nations charter, which was written after the carnage of World War II, contains a provision that no nation can use armed force without the permission of the UN Security Council.

Ferencz said that after Nuremberg the international community realized that every war results in violations by both sides, meaning the primary objective should be preventing any war from occurring in the first place.

He said the atrocities of the Iraq war--from the Abu Ghraib prison scandal and the massacre of dozens of civilians by U.S. forces in Haditha to the high number of civilian casualties caused by insurgent car bombs--were highly predictable at the start of the war.

"Every war will lead to attacks on civilians," he said. "Crimes against humanity, destruction beyond the needs of military necessity, rape of civilians, plunder--that always happens in wartime. So my answer personally, after working for 60 years on this problem and who hates to see all these young people get killed no matter what their nationality, is that you've got to stop using warfare as a means of settling your disputes."

Ferencz believes the most important development toward that end would be the effective implementation of the International Criminal Court (ICC), which is located in the Hague, Netherlands.

The court was established in 2002 and has been ratified by more than 100 countries. It is currently being used to adjudicate cases stemming from conflict in Darfur, Sudan and civil wars in Uganda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

But on May 6, 2002--less than a year before the invasion of Iraq--the Bush administration withdrew the United States' signature on the treaty and began pressuring other countries to approve bilateral agreements requiring them not to surrender U.S. nationals to the ICC.

Three months later, George W. Bush signed a new law prohibiting any U.S. cooperation with the International Criminal Court. The law went so far as to include a provision authorizing the president to "use all means necessary and appropriate," including a military invasion of the Netherlands, to free U.S. personnel detained or imprisoned by the ICC.

Full Story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lowell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent analysis and kicked!
I'd love to see the bastard face charges once he is out of office. Better yet if they were to do it right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FuzzyDicePHL Donating Member (698 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. GODDAMNED RIGHT
k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nmliberal Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks! I've forwarded this to several Bush apologists
Justice would demand that this administration stand trial for crimes against humanity. More than impeachment, I want THIS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeNearMcChord Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. I wonder if anyone will bring this up to Michael Savage.
or Michael Medved, they will probably say that Mr. Ferencz is senile, or that the former prosecutor does not understand the war on terrah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentWar Donating Member (499 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. Now if we could just get Nancy Pelosi to agree.
kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. Gets my Vote

lets ask psycho prez what he thinks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is why Bush is busily trying to repeal the War Crimes Act.
He knows he's toast once he's out of power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SutaUvaca Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. Holy shit!
Thanks for the quote and added info. I knew * was non-cooperative in regard to ICC jurisdiction, but one extra bit of info I'd never heard before - a provision to invade the Netherlands to free US personne; (who would be there charged with war crimes of course.)
Geezmarie. the fact that such words were put down in official ink at all should have been 4 inch headlines back in 2002.

Where there hell is our country?? Invade the Netherlands!@$%*@&%*#@
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitter Cup Donating Member (96 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. Pretty much been saying this for oh...
years now?

November can't come soon enough. Then we better do our best to insure our Dems find some real guts once they are elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC