mrreowwr_kittty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-29-06 01:36 AM
Original message |
Poll question: Would you vote for someone who had a DUI in the past? |
|
Reason I'm asking is that I'm working on the campaign of a candidate who made this (admittedly) stupid mistake in the past. This person is intelligent, articulate, and progressive. They also no longer drink. The longtime incumbent opponent is a rabid fundie. It happened less than a decade ago and is likely to come up in the race. I know none of you would choose the fundie over my candidate because of that. Hopefully, anyway. But I want to know if a past DUI is something that would completely turn voters off, no matter how good the candidate or how contrite the person was about it.
|
mark414
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-29-06 01:41 AM
Response to Original message |
Warren DeMontague
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-29-06 01:46 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Yes- but this person shouldn't run from it, instead acknowledge it as |
|
a mistake that they learned from.
Lots of people get DUIs- the important thing is to understand the real harm caused by drinking and driving, accept responsibility and change the behavior.
"Yes this is a serious issue-- yes, I made a mistake, and most importantly, yes, I learned from it"
|
Broken_Hero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-29-06 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
If I was in a similiar situation, that would be my course of action.
|
Skittles
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-29-06 01:48 AM
Response to Original message |
4. to believe someone should never be forgiven for a mistake is crazy |
|
I would take into account how they handled the mistake and their conduct since.
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-29-06 01:49 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I'd need to hear that it was either an incredibly stupid mistake and a definite one time thing, OR very sincere recovery program in place. The fact that he no longer drinks, by itself, might make me more leery. Then again, I'm not naive enough to believe we don't have drunks in office anyway, look at that idiot mayor in Las Vegas, well and the Pretzel and his gun-totin' VP. Still, some sort of cathartic moment would probably help him/her along.
|
mrreowwr_kittty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-29-06 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. Candidate has developed diabetes |
|
So they no longer drink mostly due to that. I don't think there was ever a drinking problem or anything, like I said, just a dumb mistake after a night of partying.
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-29-06 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
As long as nothing else came out, I'd probably give the person a pass.
|
tuvor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-29-06 01:52 AM
Response to Original message |
6. Have to say Yes, since I did. |
|
BC's current premier was arrested in Hawaii about four years ago for DUI.
There was a lot of hue 'n' cry, but come the next election, I don't think it was a factor for many BC voters. He got elected for a second term.
|
TomInTib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-29-06 01:53 AM
Response to Original message |
7. Definitely. I am almost too drunk to type this, but I could be.. |
|
Edited on Tue Aug-29-06 01:55 AM by TomInTib
the Decider.
I just know it...
Chinaco Anejo, forever.
|
Extend a Hand
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-29-06 02:09 AM
Response to Original message |
|
many very talented people have 'messy' lives. I would vote for a person with a past DUI if they acknowledged that it was a dumb mistake and I thought they were the best person for the job.
|
Richard Steele
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-29-06 02:15 AM
Response to Original message |
11. Was it a one-time event, or a lifelong habit? |
|
Either way: get AHEAD of the criticism; go PROACTIVE on the issue.
We all know that Rove has made an ART of "attacking opponents upon their STRENGTH", and we've seen it work again and again.
But there is a flipside to that coin, that can work equally as well FOR you: Scream your weaknesses from the highest rooftops!
Mention that DUI every damn chance you get! That's YOUR DUI, nobody elses! It works for YOU, not them!
Just an example: If accused of being a "cut and run liberal" in re: the Iraq occupation, you respond: "OH, was it 'cutting and running' when I quit drinking alcohol after my DUI? Should I have 'stayed the course' and kept drinking? No, that wasn't 'cutting and running', it was waking up and smelling the coffee! It was pulling my head out of my butt and admitting that I was being stupid. I faced up to my stupid mistakes, and then I stopped making them. That's not called "cutting and running", it's called "accepting personal responsibility"; it's called "learning from your mistakes".
So on and so forth; you can fit this basic notion to a wide variety of situations/memes/talking points.
|
TwentyFive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-29-06 02:32 AM
Response to Original message |
12. I'd vote for the town drunk over any right wing fundie. |
|
I'd say much has to do with the candidate's overall character, whether they are likeable or not...and how good of a job they do in explaining it.
Another point: People set a lower standard for local offices. It not that anybody can win, but few people expect a Bill Clinton caliber person running for City Council.
Good luck on your candidate winning...
|
politicat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-29-06 02:32 AM
Response to Original message |
13. Talk about it openly and defuse the subject. |
|
Yes, you will lose a few of the most rabid. Fuck 'em they were looking for an excuse to run anyway. You're more likely to gain a lot of voters who will admire that someone had the guts to change and to admit it.
Hiding it is the worst thing to do - it's not the mistake, it's the coverup that fucks things up.
|
DRoseDARs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-29-06 02:42 AM
Response to Original message |
14. Didn't vote; didn't seem to fit my opinion, but here are my thoughts... |
|
It really depends on how they carried themselves afterward. If they gave up drinking altogether, that's one thing: They learned their lesson and swore off the stuff. If they continued to drink afterwards, but in moderation and followed a strict no drink-n-drive policy, that's forgivable too.
|
Alacrat
(306 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-29-06 03:10 AM
Response to Original message |
15. There is something strange about a person with no skeletons in |
|
Edited on Tue Aug-29-06 03:12 AM by Alacrat
their closet. I'm not talking murder, or corp corruption, but a dui, admitting to smoking pot, etc.. A person so straight laced, who has never made any mistakes, is just to square for me. I believe every politicians has past issues, if they say don't, they just haven't been caught. It's like masturbation, some will admit to it, the ones that don't, are lying.
|
Kickoutthejams23
(354 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-29-06 07:52 AM
Response to Original message |
16. Now was it one of those .08 DUIs |
|
Or did she get drunk and run over a crowd of orphans. I mean there is a difference. That said as another poster pointed out there is something creepy about someone who has never ever done anything bad in their life.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:19 PM
Response to Original message |