Imagevision
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-31-06 10:23 PM
Original message |
Bush is attemptiong to do to Iran what he did to Iraq, Regime Change |
|
even his dialogue is the same.
|
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-31-06 10:26 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Agree -- I think PNAC and that bunch want to strike Iran, but this |
|
time I don't believe the Congress and the voters are going to play along.
|
madokie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-31-06 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. all the more reason for another mihop or lihop |
spindrifter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-31-06 10:29 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Another agreement--I think * |
|
goes berserk every time he thinks about Mr. Ahmedinijad besting him in these skirmishes over uranium enrichment.
|
Bobbieo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-31-06 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. I think the 'shrub' has finally met his match |
|
BUT I don't know whether to laugh or cry!!!
|
madokie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-31-06 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. mayby only a nervous chuckle from me. |
|
on the one hand I laugh for all the shit they have themselves in, on the other hand I cry at all we have allowed to happen to us before we took a stand.
|
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-31-06 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
8. If I were the Iranian President, I'd be pushing for nuclear power plants. |
|
Edited on Thu Aug-31-06 10:40 PM by TahitiNut
Their oil is worth far too much on the world market to burn it themselves ... and when the oil runs out they'll just be a nation of sand and few exportable resources. Unless they can build an industrial base and infrastructure, they're lost. I'd say it's even more imperative that they move to alternative energy than other nations - they have the most to lose. The Western "industrial" nations (i..e. the global corporatists) don't want that, though. The US, in particular, doesn't want the competition and wants nations that're permanently impoverished as a source of cheap labor - eventually, the US will be its own source of cheap labor but there's no limit on the appetite of corporatists for it. That's why Mexico has gone nowhere and is going nowhere. Every petroleum exporting country is in the same situation - it's imperative they find alternative energy sources. When their oil is gone, they won't have a chance. None.
|
Imagevision
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-31-06 10:36 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Same scenario, Russia & China say no to Bush, for openers... |
Imagevision
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-31-06 10:39 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Who's intel is Bush using this time? Porter Goss fired all CIA |
|
personnel who disagreed with Bushco lead up to Iraq invasion, anyone who disagreed with Niger documents were fired or allowed to resign...
|
Jamastiene
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-31-06 10:42 PM
Response to Original message |
Ilsa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-31-06 10:49 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Our congresscritters need to be reminded that Iran is much further |
|
away from nuclear development than what Bush* wants them to believe.
|
jerry611
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-31-06 10:55 PM
Response to Original message |
11. No, it is possibly the beginning of World War 3 |
|
If you havnt noticed, there is something different here. France and Germany in particular were huge critics to the Iraq war. However, they don't seem to be voicing much opposition against the US now when it comes to Iran. And the reason why is because Iran is a much bigger threat to Europe than Saddam was...A MUCH bigger threat.
Depending on who you believe, the Iranians are projected by most western nations to have a ballistic missile capable of reaching Berlin, Paris, or possibly even London by the end of this decade. If they also develop a nuclear weapon at the same time, we enter into a different ballgame. The Europeans will fall back into the cold war mode and begin to favor American foreign policy in the mid-east. It would also put a strain on European-American relations with Russia and China. So now you will start to see the world powers taking sides.
Look, of course I don't have a crystal ball. But I dont think the geo-political picture can continue much longer in the status quo. The US is trying to aquire natural resources. The Chinese are a growing into a monsterous economic power. The Russians are acting like Russians again. 3rd world dictators are trying to develop nuclear weapons.
The world is on a very dangerous path.
|
DemonFighterLives
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-31-06 11:07 PM
Response to Original message |
12. The War President is beating the war drum again |
|
He made me sick to my stomach. Diplomacy be damned. :argh:
|
Erika
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-01-06 01:07 AM
Response to Original message |
13. When he starts sending the Bush clan to fight |
|
I'll give him some credence.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:18 PM
Response to Original message |