Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

kos: Lieberman will not caucus with Democrats

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 12:39 AM
Original message
kos: Lieberman will not caucus with Democrats
Edited on Fri Sep-01-06 12:45 AM by longship
This is big news. I'll let kos speak for this, himself. He cites an internal Lieberman memo obtained by the AP. Is AP going to drop this bomb? Or, is this something the Blogospherians have to do.


Lieberman is in it for himself. He'll caucus with whoever can offer him the best deal. He hasn't had any loyalties to the Democratic Party in a long time, and nothing has changed.

Concerns about the senator's return were evident in an internal memo obtained by The Associated Press.

"We should discuss his schedule when he's in DC and whether it makes sense to go to Caucus events, etc. or not," wrote a senior Lieberman aide to several other top staffers.

Party leaders who try to play nice with him are being played for suckers. Lieberman already turned back on promises to stick with the Democratic Party in return for their support in the primary, and there's nothing he could say that he wouldn't toss by the wayside if it wasn't in his interest.

That's "integrity" Lieberman-style at play.


So, here we go. And there goes Joe.

Link here

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. So what is new?
Lieberman is a true disappointment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. What is new is that the AP has a memo.
This is huge news if this is true and it gets out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaryRN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good news for us for sure in terms of having more evidence of his treason
but I hope Harry Reid can put on his alleged boxing gloves and deal with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
31. I just sent Harry Reid an email asking him to
stand up and be a Democrat! IMHO, Ned Lamont is Jimmy Stewart in 'Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.' He's the best thing I've seen come along for the Dems in a damn long time.

I asked Reid...."Don't you know a good thing when you see it?"

Lieberman hasn't been a Democrat for a very long time.....!

Please join me and write Reid and if you got time, write Schumer as well.

Thx.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. So who didn't see that coming?
This kind of sums up the whole problem with our party, party leaders trying to play nice and being played for suckers. Are they ever going to learn?:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
20. The big guns at the DLC.
> So who didn't see that coming?

The big guns at the DLC such as Al From.

The alternative theory, of course, and the one I actually
subscribe to is that the DLC *ARE NOT DEMOCRATS*, they are
corporatists and they understood (and understand) completely
what principles Lieberman stood for/stands for and they agree
with those "principles".

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FighttheFuture Donating Member (748 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 03:47 AM
Response to Reply #20
44. That alternative theory seems pretty on target!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sipsake Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. I know there was talk
Any chance that Reid will strip LIEberman of his committee appointments before the election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I've heard that this isn't possible.
There's some issues with this. It might mean a rule change, which would involve the Repukes. I'm no expert on this, but it's something which was reported somewhere around here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 04:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Why not?
Edited on Fri Sep-01-06 04:48 AM by DoYouEverWonder
Lieberman is no longer a DEM.

Didn't they pull Jeffers off of all his committees when he switched to IND?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #9
18. Committee assignments have to be approved by the whole Senate.
Edited on Fri Sep-01-06 06:49 AM by IMModerate
--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 04:39 AM
Response to Original message
7. I am not shocked. This is about Joe's ego
One is best not to stand between a man and what he thinks he is. He would make a good pal to Bush it seems. Two men who are right and you better believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
19. "Two men who are right and you better believe it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 04:42 AM
Response to Original message
8. Let us hope that CT will not return him to DC to caucus with
Edited on Fri Sep-01-06 04:42 AM by Skidmore
anyone. Message should be that Lieberman cannot be counted on to represent the people, only himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
10. This means no chance for a majority in the Senate if LIE wins the general.
Edited on Fri Sep-01-06 05:29 AM by w4rma
He won't be voting for Sen. Reid as Senate Majority Leader. LIE will be voting for Sen. Frist for Senate Majority Leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 05:34 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Um. Frist isn't running for his seat.
Whoever is Republican leader in January, it won't be Frist because he's goin' back to doctorin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 05:45 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. That's right. Frist's replacement. Majority Whip Sen. McConnell, maybe.
Edited on Fri Sep-01-06 05:50 AM by w4rma
It'll be fun. :sarcasm: The headlines from the AP, Reuters, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox News:

LIEberman says McConnell is a "good man whom I can vote for"
Republican Party succeeds in retaining control of the Senate for 2 more years.
President* Bush's power remains unchecked.
LIEberamn presses Bush to expand the Iraq War.
LIEberman says Democratic Party isn't the Party it used to be and is "weak against terrorists".

LIE *must* be defeated. Now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #11
27. ...Then runnin' for President
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #10
24. This is precisely how the Repigs have been playing this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
13. The last Dem pushed out of the caucus was Rep Jim Traficant of Youngstown
Edited on Fri Sep-01-06 05:49 AM by TheBorealAvenger
The Mahoning Valley turncoat voted for Hastert as Speaker of the House, so Gephardt threw him out of the caucus in January. Traficant had zero committee assignments.

Note: the WaPo article does not say that JoeLie is leaving the Dem caucus. Markos still needs a reference for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. "… whether it makes sense to go to Caucus events, etc. *or not* …"
Edited on Fri Sep-01-06 05:53 AM by w4rma
Don't be a sucker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 06:00 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Still kind of tangential
and don't call me names
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 06:04 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Sorry, this is all you get in detective work like this. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #13
23. Good memory!!!
I had forgotten about that.

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #13
28. Ah, Jim Traficant, the corrupt DINO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #28
37. And all this time I thought it was a rug
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
15. Interesting
Kos has generally been ahead of the curve on Lieberman... so, I'm not surprised. But, I don't think it's certifiable evidence that he is not going to caucus with the Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
21. I knew it. He's going to sell himself to the highest bidder
I wish I were surprised by this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
22. I assume Lamont will let all CT Democrats know this - loud and clear, n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #22
39. Yeah, that's what I like about that guy
Not afraid to tell it like it is. If only we a a bunch more like him running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corkhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
25. Repukes won't want him as soon as he is their's. He's a LIBRUL!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
26. Aw, so when he goes on Faux News to bash Dems,
he'll be an independent. Makes me sad.

And now he can't spy on democrats by being in their caucuses. Aw.

:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
29. This reminds me
of the story that Lieberman was going to run as a Republican. The source was some "unnamed" person in the Lieberman campaign and never checked out. If the AP releases it, then obviously there is some truth to it. Until then, it's just another unconfirmed story released by a blogger desperate to get ahead of the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
30. Call Harry Reid and ask that he gets booted from committees too.
Edited on Fri Sep-01-06 10:30 AM by Botany
Washington
528 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: 202-224-3542 / Fax: 202-224-7327

Ask to speak to a staff member and tell them if Joe is running as a dem,
talking w/ Rove on the phone, and helping republicans .... Joe can get
his ass the hell of any committees as a dem.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pierogi_Pincher Donating Member (323 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Just made a call...
Staff said Sen. Reid will make decision re: Dem caucus issue after the GE. Can't do anything before.
Told me many are vocal re: what LIEberman is doing.

P_P :dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
32. What does it take? What does it Freakin' TAKE?!?!
Sometimes it is really, really hard to support the Democratic Leadership in this country. Does ANYONE believe that a Republican Senator could get away with this and still maintain his senority and comittee seats? Maybe they will still offer them to him when he officially accepts a position in the Republican party, as well!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FighttheFuture Donating Member (748 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 04:02 AM
Response to Reply #32
49. Getting rid of assholes who don't act as Dems, like CT did to Joey!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
34. The AP Wire Story.
Edited on Fri Sep-01-06 12:04 PM by longship
Here's AP's story on this. Clearly, they are playing down the memo. Mention doesn't occur until the middle of the article. The title says nothing about it.

AP: Lieberman, Lamont Head to Washington
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
35. I agree he's in it for himself -- which is why he'll caucus with Dems...
to do otherwise would be political suicide, and Lieberman isn't planning on retireing in 2012, I imagine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FighttheFuture Donating Member (748 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 03:54 AM
Response to Reply #35
45. That presupposes that the Dems would actually win....
for Joe does what is only good for Joe. He'll caucus whichever way the wind is blowing, but his inclination is Rethuglican so expect some caucusing there at first, regardless of how things look for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
36. over the top mischaracterization of the memo
Frankly, I hope (and believe) that this will be moot because Lamont will win the election in November. But the alleged smoking gun memo does not indicate that Lieberman will not caucus with the Democrats if he is re-elected. It raises the question of whether he should be attending caucus events during the remainder of the congressional session. Again, I hope it doesn't come to this, but should Lieberman get re-elected, I think you can count on him caucusing with the Democrats, not the repubs. If I'm wrong, I'll kick in $15 to DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FighttheFuture Donating Member (748 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 03:59 AM
Response to Reply #36
46. You would be foolish to "count on him" for anything!
Get your $15 ready.

Sure, Joey "its all mine" Lieberman will caucus with the Dem's on a few things, and the Presstitutes will play it up big on how he's still a dem, so you can all go back to sleep now. Yet, I am 100% sure that when it comes to something critical, like it was with Alito, or Bankruptcy, or CAFTA, Joey's nose and tongue will be deep up Bush and the Rethuglican's assholes! He is, after all, nothing but a fundi whore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkb Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
38. Containing Recklessness Or Concerning Obedient Dog
     I think my friends should learn what I think are the
fundamentals here.  That probably is not to put too much faith
in politicians, even though they are the ones that make the
ultimate decisions over societal functions.
     We are reminded about "driving drunk", and
therefore should be careful when attending to those
"societal functions".
     I will not expect too much from Lieberman in this regard,
and on the good side, people all over are learning from his
actions.
     I expect things to go back and forth, and hopefully my
friends, wherever they may be, will not get too excited about
sudden improvement.  Hope for the best, but don't ruin
stability by expecting too much.  I think I'm on the right
track here.  New discoveries about Pluto, I hope are good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
40. NOW can he be stripped of committee memberships?
Edited on Fri Sep-01-06 03:46 PM by Canuckistanian
Or are still some lingering hallucinations that Joe will ever come back to the party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitSileya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #40
43. Unfortunately, committee memberships are handed out in a joint
agreement with the Repukes - apparently they make a resolution that is ok'ed unanimously. This means that for Reid to strip Lieberman of committee memberships *now*, he'd have to get the Repukes to agree to it - not very likely. It'll soonest happen in January, but hopefully it'll be a moot point, as Connecticut won't send him back to the Senate for a new term.

I'm no fan of the DLC, but in this instance, let's not berate Reid for not doing something he simply has no way of doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FighttheFuture Donating Member (748 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 04:00 AM
Response to Reply #43
47. I believe Reid can strip him, that's for approvals, not for removals,
Edited on Sun Sep-03-06 04:00 AM by FighttheFuture
which are party controlled. If I'm wrong, please prove it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murpheeslaw Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
41. Slightly off topic and very shallow . . .
Does anyone else think he looks like Emperor Palpatine? (Star Wars geekyness REALLY hanging out.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FighttheFuture Donating Member (748 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 04:01 AM
Response to Reply #41
48. I've thought this for years. Also, the Dad from Alf. Nothing shallow
about identifying evil via iconic images. Quite appropriate, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
42. This needs a K n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC