in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-21-06 02:37 PM
Original message |
|
Wyden to oppose Alito MATTHEW DALY Associated Press Writer January 20, 2006
Comments (0) Print Email Subscribe
WASHINGTON (AP) — Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden said Friday he will oppose Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito, saying he is not convinced that Alito will bring an impartial viewpoint to the court.
Wyden, a Democrat, met with Alito on Wednesday and talked about executive power, legal precedents and abortion rights.
“I cannot reconcile the seemingly moderate and amiable jurist of the past few weeks” with Alito’s two-decade record as a federal appeals court judge and official in the Reagan and Bush administrations, Wyden said Friday.
“It is my conclusion that Judge Alito’s record portends a view on the power of the president that would undermine our proven and constitutionally-mandated system of checks and balances,” Wyden said.
“His record demonstrates a dangerous and narrow interpretation of the commerce clause (of the Constitution), which could lead to results that would threaten the health and safety of all Americans.”
Wyden also criticized Alito for “standing with large, corporate polluters who fouled our air, poisoned our waters, and then don’t want to pay for it.”
Wyden is the latest among a growing number of Democrats who say they will oppose Alito, a veteran appeals court judge from New Jersey. Wyden voted for Chief Justice John Roberts last fall.
The Senate Judiciary Committee is scheduled to vote Tuesday on Alito’s nomination to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, with the full Senate voting after that. Alito is widely expected to be confirmed by the Republican-controlled chamber.
Sen. Gordon Smith, R-Ore., has said he expects to vote for Alito, calling him “supremely qualified.”
|
0007
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-21-06 02:38 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Hip hip hooray! Happy to hear .. |
Mr_Spock
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-21-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Another Senator with a brain |
|
RW morons aren't selling this rotten egg.
|
patrice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-21-06 02:51 PM
Response to Original message |
3. In Alito's record, is there a basis for saying that he'll |
|
Edited on Sat Jan-21-06 02:52 PM by patrice
support, if not increase, the rate of incarceration in the U.S. when Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Guideline cases come before him?
I want to write a LTE that says families whose children have made or will make one kind of mistake or another need to fear Alito, especially in light of privitization of Prisons. Our prisons will become even more the Crime Career institutes they already are - and - to the extent that those who are in Prison become hopeless, the constituents of violent Revolution, "Communist" or otherwise, are also nurtured there.
|
newyawker99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-21-06 04:59 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Per DU copyright rules please post only four paragrpahs from the copyrighted news source and provide a link to the source.
Thank you.
NYer99 DU Moderator
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-21-06 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. I'm sorry, newyawker99 |
|
:spank: I lost my head...I was so excited. :spank:
|
Flabbergasted
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-21-06 06:11 PM
Response to Original message |
UTUSN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-21-06 09:27 PM
Response to Original message |
7. I thought all Dems except NELSON were opposing |
|
Is this not the case? Why the one-by-one dribbling of names opposing?
|
bigwillq
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-21-06 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. That hasn't been confirmed yet. |
|
There's still a lot of DEM senators who have not made any announcements regarding their stance on Alito.
|
bigwillq
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-21-06 09:28 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:25 AM
Response to Original message |